2010
DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2009.1404
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pelvic Floor Consequences of Cesarean Delivery on Maternal Request in Women with a Single Birth: A Cost-effectiveness Analysis

Abstract: When a woman without medical/obstetric indications has only one childbirth in her lifetime, cost-effectiveness analysis does not reveal a clearly preferable mode of delivery.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 107 publications
0
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Results in the NICE guidelines noted that a planned CS was less expensive than an unplanned CS [this finding is also noted in references and ]. Furthermore, the NICE guidelines conclude that unplanned CSs contribute to significantly more adverse maternal and infant outcomes compared with all other modes of birth.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Results in the NICE guidelines noted that a planned CS was less expensive than an unplanned CS [this finding is also noted in references and ]. Furthermore, the NICE guidelines conclude that unplanned CSs contribute to significantly more adverse maternal and infant outcomes compared with all other modes of birth.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Normal prenatal testing, composed of amniocentesis and chorionic villous sampling, had a utility value of 0.92 (21), and colposcopy or cervix biopsy was given a value of 0.89 (22). In addition, an instrumental vaginal delivery had a utility value of 0.76, whereas an emergency cesarean delivery had a utility value of 0.59 (23).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When data ranges were not available from the literature, we used +/−25% of the base value for the sensitivity analysis. 45 To demonstrate the potential net savings of immediate postpartum implant insertion, we also conducted a cost–benefit analysis by accounting for avoided costs associated with potential subsequent pregnancies from the health care system’s perspective. All analyses were conducted with TreeAge software (TreeAge Pro 2012, TreeAge Software, Inc., Williamstown, MA).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%