2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.10.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pelvic bone marrow sparing radiotherapy for cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) is the standard treatment for locally advanced cervical cancer [ 1 ]. Compared to radiation therapy (RT) and chemotherapy alone, CCRT improves the overall survival rate and local control rate, with a 5-year survival rate of 30-80% [ 2 , 3 ]. CCRT improved the prognosis of patients with cervical cancer, while the incidence of hematological toxicity (HT) of G2 + was 69.5% [ 1 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) is the standard treatment for locally advanced cervical cancer [ 1 ]. Compared to radiation therapy (RT) and chemotherapy alone, CCRT improves the overall survival rate and local control rate, with a 5-year survival rate of 30-80% [ 2 , 3 ]. CCRT improved the prognosis of patients with cervical cancer, while the incidence of hematological toxicity (HT) of G2 + was 69.5% [ 1 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kumar et al [ 10 ] reported that G4 HT was associated with PBM V 20 > 45%. In many studies, PBM V 20 was significantly associated with HT, and V 40 was an important predictor of G2 + HT [ 12 , 14 ]. The HT produced during concurrent chemoradiotherapy can last for at least three months after treatment is completed [ 25 , 26 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our previous study, we found a significant positive correlation between fat content changes in the 5–10 Gy irradiated PBM region and the nadir of lymphocytes and neutrophils during chemoradiotherapy [ 11 ]. A meta-analysis showed that bone marrow sparing (BMS) techniques could effectively reduce the bone marrow dose and the incidence of grade 2 or 3 HT by approximately 70% [ 12 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Efforts to spare bone marrow might be beneficial and worthwhile to be evaluated prospectively. 11 , 12 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%