2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2016.01.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pellets valorization of waste biomass harvested by coagulation of freshwater algae

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Biomass pellets (BP) are used in combustion engineering due to its higher density and combustion efficiency than that of biomass feedstock [1]. Wood fuel is the main source of raw material for the production of biomass pellets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biomass pellets (BP) are used in combustion engineering due to its higher density and combustion efficiency than that of biomass feedstock [1]. Wood fuel is the main source of raw material for the production of biomass pellets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After bead formation, the trapped algal species have exposure to surrounding and can use light and carbon dioxide for growth in the presence of nutrients as growth medium. Cancela et al (2016) has reported coagulation of algal culture using calcium chloride, sodium alginate and tannins of Eucalyptus globulus bark but not for isolation of different strains from mix culture [10]. In addition to this, the calcium is a component of algal medium and may not have any inhibiting effect at appropriate concentration.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, galacturonic acid has negatively charged COO– groups or residues, which are responsible for generating repulsion with the –COOH groups of alginic acid (Soto-Ramírez et al 2021 ). Additionally, at pH below 7.0 ± 0.2, this polymer does not efficiently coagulate microalgae because acidic functional groups that interfere with electrostatic attraction predominate (Cancela et al 2016 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%