2012
DOI: 10.1088/0029-5515/52/8/083006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pellet fuelling requirements to allow self-burning on a helical-type fusion reactor

Abstract: Pellet refuelling conditions to sustain a self-burning plasma have been investigated by extrapolating the confinement property of the LHD plasma, which appears to be governed by a gyro-Bohm-type confinement property. The power balance of the burning plasma is calculated taking into account the profile change with pellet deposition and subsequent density relaxation. A self-burning plasma is achieved within the scope of conventional pellet injection technology. However, a very small burn-up rate of 0.18% is pred… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
23
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(24 reference statements)
2
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2). Second, the density is further increasing to about 70% above the value before pellet EX/P5-1 injection on a much longer time scale (~400ms) consistent with earlier observation [11]. On the same time scale, the temperatures recover.…”
Section: Pellet Fueling In the Large Helical Devicesupporting
confidence: 87%
“…2). Second, the density is further increasing to about 70% above the value before pellet EX/P5-1 injection on a much longer time scale (~400ms) consistent with earlier observation [11]. On the same time scale, the temperatures recover.…”
Section: Pellet Fueling In the Large Helical Devicesupporting
confidence: 87%
“…A more quantitative treatment of the effects of transient density profile shaping in LHD had been published before [17], also taking into account the mutual interaction between plasma transport as a function of the plasma parameters, and the profile perturbation by pellets. The interplay between pellet re-fuelling and density relaxation phenomena, with focus on the requirements of a burning fusion plasma, is presented in detail in [18]. In order not to repeat the arguments developed there, we restrict ourselves here to the description of the observed phenomena, and their possible implications for the technique of pellet series injection.…”
Section: Density Profile Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to predict the burning plasma properties on the basis of the LHD experiments, the direct profile extrapolation (DPE) method [5], in which the normalized plasma pressure profile obtained from the LHD experiment is directly extrapolated into a burning plasma by assuming gyro-Bohm type parameter dependence, has been extended to a dynamic plasma profile analysis. A similar analysis method was adopted in a previous paper [6], but an evaluation method for the particle diffusion coefficient, which impacts the fueling efficiency, has been updated in this paper. The principal justifications for the DPE method are based on the facts that (i) the LHD plasma shows gyro-Bohm type parameter dependence under wide experimental conditions, (ii) the collisionality of the selfburning plasma in a helical reactor (ν * b ∼ 0.1 − 0.4) is within the range of collisionality in the LHD experimental regime, 0.01 and (iii) the heating power density of the LHD experiments, 0.25∼0.5 MW/m 3 , corresponds to that of the self-burning plasma.…”
Section: A Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since this model supposes similarity in the plasma pressure profile between the LHD plasma and the burning plasma, the pressure profile of the burning plasma can be extrapolated directly without consuming much computing time. This extrapolation method has been extended to a dynamic plasma profile analysis taking into account the source profile of the fueling and the diffusive nature of plasma particle confinement [6], [7]. In this study, possible gaps between the current LHD experiment and the reactor operation have been investigated using the above mentioned dynamic profile extrapolation model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%