Food webs in three lakes were manipulated by altering fish communities to promote or suppress the abundance of large Daphnia. These lakes and an unmanipulated reference lake were monitored for 2 yr. The three experimental lakes were then fertilized for 2 yr with nitrogen and phosphorus. Bacterial responses to these manipulations were examined by means of weekly measurements of abundance and production. Bacterial production, measured both by thymidine and leucine incorporation, increased substantially in the fertilized lakes, whereas abundance increased a small amount. Timeseries models based on P loading explained substantial variation in both measures of bacterial production, suggesting strong regulation by P. Phytoplankton also increased with fertilization, but covariation of primary production and chlorophyll with bacterial production was relatively weak. Protozoans did not consume the increased bacterial production observed in the fertilized lakes. Bacterial abundance was instead regulated by consumption by Daphnia in at least two of the three fertilized lakes. Interannual variation in bacterial production during the 2 yr of fertilization was related to variation in pH, suggesting that environmental conditions also drive variability in bacterial activity. Overall, the experiments indicate that bacterial abur.dance and production are regulated by nutrients and, at high nutrient loading, by metazoan rather than by protozoan predators. With fertilization, bacterial production increased more rapidly than did abundance because bacterial predators limited abundance. The primary response of bacteria to eutrophication was higher specific growth rates.Planktonic bacteria are an abundant and important component of aquatic ecosystems. The functional significance of planktonic bacteria in biogeochemical cycles, energy flow, and secondary production is now well described (Stockner and Porter 1988;Ducklow and Carlson 1992). Furthermore, the conversion of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) to CO2 by oceanic bacteria is one of several examples where planktonic bacteria mediate key pathways in global biogeochemical cycles (Ducklow and Carlson 1992). Despite the metabolic and biogeochemical significance of planktonic bacteria, ecological factors regulating their abundance, biomass, and productivity remain unclear.One way to examine the ecological regulation of bacteria is to search for general patterns that relate bacterial abundance and productivity to possible regulatory factors. This approach usually requires analyses of data from many systems and explicitly considers bacteria at the ecosystem scale. Three general hypotheses have emerged from these comparative studies. Cole et al. (1988) documented
AcknowledgmentsWe thank J. Kitchell, J. Hodgson, S. Carpenter, and their students for establishing the food web manipulations, for data and insights on fish populations, and for occasional shock treatments. S. Carpenter and colleagues shared supporting data on plankton populations, nutrient chemistry, and primary productivit...