2014
DOI: 10.1186/ar4497
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pegloticase immunogenicity: the relationship between efficacy and antibody development in patients treated for refractory chronic gout

Abstract: IntroductionThe efficacy of pegloticase, a polyethylene glycol (PEG)-conjugated mammalian recombinant uricase, approved for chronic refractory gout, can be limited by the development of antibodies (Ab). Analyses from 2 replicate, 6-month, randomized controlled trials were performed to characterize Ab responses to pegloticase.MethodsAnti-pegloticase, anti-PEG, and anti-uricase Ab were determined by validated enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. Ab titers were analyzed for possible relationships with serum peglot… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

6
194
0
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 209 publications
(203 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
6
194
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, neither anti-uricase IgG nor IgM were detected in the rat group treated with uricase-PCBX. Our results here are consistent with clinical findings, showing that PEGylation cannot completely prevent the generation of anti-protein antibodies, at least for highly immunogenic uricase (9). This finding supports our hypothesis that comprehensive surface coverage of a protein with a stealth polymer network can effectively render the protein "invisible" to the immune system and thus mitigate antibody induction.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In contrast, neither anti-uricase IgG nor IgM were detected in the rat group treated with uricase-PCBX. Our results here are consistent with clinical findings, showing that PEGylation cannot completely prevent the generation of anti-protein antibodies, at least for highly immunogenic uricase (9). This finding supports our hypothesis that comprehensive surface coverage of a protein with a stealth polymer network can effectively render the protein "invisible" to the immune system and thus mitigate antibody induction.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The haptenic character of PEG is considered the main culprit in the therapeutic efficacy loss of PEGylated products. Recent clinical studies of Pegloticase (PEGylated uricase) in refractory chronic gout patients unequivocally demonstrated that anti-PEG antibodies correlate with a reduction in drug effectiveness-Pegloticase loses efficacy in more than 40% of patients, and the presence of anti-PEG antibodies doubles the risk of infusion reactions (8,9). Similar results have also been observed for other PEGylated proteins in clinical use, including PEG-asparaginase (10) and Peginterferon alfa (11).…”
mentioning
confidence: 62%
“…In the case of PEGylated interferon, a high prevalence of anti-PEG pre-Abs was not associated with impaired response to PEG-interferon in hepatitis C patients (16). In the case of Pegloticase ™ , a recombinant pegylated porcine uricase, low titer predominately IgM isotype pre-Abs with presumed anti-PEG specificity were detected in 15% of patients and did not predict subsequent impact on the drug effect (63). In a separate study, pre-existing anti-Pegloticase ™ antibodies with specificity to the PEG moiety found in 19% of drug-naïve patients partially contributed to the increased clearance and reduced efficacy of the drug (64).…”
Section: Pegylated Biologic Proteinsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Overall, the prevalence and impact of the anti-PEG preAbs varies with specific products and study populations (16,(62)(63)(64)(65)(66) (Table II). High incidences of treatment induced anti-PEG antibodies have been documented only for the large conjugates of highly immunogenic proteins, such as Pegloticase ™ (Table II).…”
Section: Pegylated Biologic Proteinsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Назначение препарата позволяет дос-тичь целевого уровня МК у 42% пациентов, но широкое его применение ограничено из-за частых аллегрических реакций и высокой стоимости [120,121]. В Российской Федерации препарат не зарегистрирован.…”
unclassified