Pegasoferae, an unexpected mammalian clade revealed by tracking ancient retroposon insertions

Abstract

Despite the recent large-scale efforts dedicated to comprehensive phylogenetic analyses using mitochondrial and nuclear DNA sequences, several relationships among mammalian orders remain controversial. Here, we present an extensive application of retroposon (L1) insertion analysis to the phylogenetic relationships among almost all mammalian orders. In addition to demonstrating the validity of Glires, Euarchontoglires, Laurasiatheria, and Boreoeutheria, we demonstrate an interordinal clade that links Chiroptera, Carnivora, and Perissodactyla within Laurasiatheria. Re-examination of a large DNA sequence data set yielded results consistent with our conclusion. We propose a superordinal name ''Pegasoferae'' for this clade of Chiroptera ؉ Perissodactyla ؉ Carnivora ؉ Pholidota. The presence of a single incongruent L1 locus generates a tree in which the group of Carnivora ؉ Perissodactyla associates with Cetartiodactyla but not with Chiroptera. This result suggests that incomplete lineage sorting of an ancestral dimorphism occurred with regard to the presence or absence of retroposon alleles in a common ancestor of Scrotifera (Pegasoferae ؉ Cetartiodactyla), which was followed by rapid divergence into the extant orders over an evolutionarily short period. Accordingly, Euungulata (Cetartiodactyla ؉ Perissodactyla) and Fereuungulata (Carnivora ؉ Pholidota ؉ Perissodactyla ؉ Cetartiodactyla) cannot be validated as natural groups. The interordinal mammalian relationships presented here provide a cornerstone for future studies in the reconstruction of mammalian classifications, including extinct species, on evolution of large genomic sequences and structure, and in developmental analysis of morphological diversification.intron ͉ long interspersed element 1 ͉ mammalian phylogeny

Measuring Fit of Sequence Data to Phylogenetic Model: Gain of Power Using Marginal Tests

“…Figure 2 shows both these taxa to be fairly average, raising the issue as to whether either is a strong offender of overall assumptions. If they are, it is not enough to stop bats and perissodactyls grouping in this gene tree analysis, a clade consistent with suggestions by Okada et al (2006). A similar result holds for the pair Sus (pig) and Camelus (camel), and here too there should be suspicion of the relationship of these two to Cetruminatia, based only on sequence data.…”

Parallel signatures of sequence evolution among hearing genes in echolocating mammals: an emerging model of genetic convergence

“…In this method, posterior probabilities of all possible amino-acid substitutions were calculated along each branch under a JTT+F+G model of amino-acid substitution. We used tree topologies based on published data (Csorba et al, 2003;Nishihara et al, 2006;Miller-Butterworth et al, 2007;Murphy et al, 2007;McGowen et al, 2009;Khan et al, 2010) and we estimated branch lengths using MrBayes v3.1.2. For all pair-wise branch comparisons where both branches followed divergent paths, the sum of the joint probabilities of all possible pairs of convergent substitutions (same amino acid) and divergent substitutions were calculated.…”

Primate origins, human origins, and the end of higher taxa

“…As in the case of 65 Based on Bloch and coworkers, 64 with modifications from other sources. 49,[66][67][68][69][70][71][72] the early mammals, they present a picture of gradualistic accretion of small derived traits -first a cluster of changes in molar occlusal pattern, then elongation of the phalanges of the hand, then shortening of the metatarsals, then elongation of the tarsals and a cluster of cranial innovations -with every stage in the accretion being documented by a series of stem groups branching off the line leading to the last common ancestor of the living primates. This is the same pattern that we find in the early mammaloids, and one that we would expect to find on the basis of theory.…”