2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.htct.2019.01.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

PEG-asparaginase and native Escherichia coli L-asparaginase in acute lymphoblastic leukemia in children and adolescents: a systematic review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
9
0
3

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
9
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The difference in PFS and OS was not significant between groups. This is consistent with the systematic evaluation result of Medawar (33), which was based on populations of the USA, Puerto Rico, and Canada. Studies from the United States and India conducted evaluations on local patients and also demonstrated that there were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of event-free survival and OS (11)(12)(13).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The difference in PFS and OS was not significant between groups. This is consistent with the systematic evaluation result of Medawar (33), which was based on populations of the USA, Puerto Rico, and Canada. Studies from the United States and India conducted evaluations on local patients and also demonstrated that there were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of event-free survival and OS (11)(12)(13).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The serendipitous detection of strong antileukemic properties of guinea pig serum 2 was attributed by Broom et al 3 to L-asparaginase activity, and indeed low (μM) K m bacterial asparaginases (Class 1 in revised classification 4 ) of type II 5 , notably E. coli EcAII, but not type I (e.g. EcAI with mM K m 6 ) became potent drugs in the treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) 7 . Later, it was realized that plants possess different, Ntn-type, asparaginases (some of which, e.g.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, L-ASP formulation was believed to affect the treatment outcome, and it was replaced by PEG-ASP that has a longer half-life and is potentially less immunogenic. However, recent research shows that L-ASP and PEG-ASP demonstrate similar efficacy and safety [57]. Place et al [58] reported that with a median follow-up of 6.0 years, the 5-year OS was 89% (95% CI = 85-93) for L-ASP and 90% (95% CI = 85-93) for PEG-ASP (P = 0.58).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%