2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10549-018-5033-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Peer support interventions for breast cancer patients: a systematic review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
58
0
3

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
2
58
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…For this reason, the title of this article specifies the fields (medicine and nursing) to which it pertains. Similar to systematic reviews exploring programs targeting different populations, 10,22,23 this review identified various types of peer support interventions and programs, delivering such support in different ways. This heterogeneity led to the classification of peer support delivery type based on existing work.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this reason, the title of this article specifies the fields (medicine and nursing) to which it pertains. Similar to systematic reviews exploring programs targeting different populations, 10,22,23 this review identified various types of peer support interventions and programs, delivering such support in different ways. This heterogeneity led to the classification of peer support delivery type based on existing work.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We then performed a quality assessment of each study included using an 8-point scale which was first used in a meta-analysis in 200 9 [8] and has subsequently been cited by other researchers [24][25][26][27]. One point was awarded for each of the following items: (1) prospective cohort; (2) control or comparison group; (3) pre/post intervention data; (4) random assignment of participants to the intervention; (5) follow-up rate of 80% or more; (6) comparison groups equivalent in terms of social-demographic measures; (7) comparison groups equivalent at baseline in terms of outcome measures; and (8) sample size≥100.…”
Section: Data Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Peer-based interventions also contribute to reduced depression and helplessness, better health management, increased self-efficacy, coping skills, self-care activities, self-confidence, and health-related behaviours such as physical activity and reduced smoking in aging populations [ 18 , 22 ]. A small number of studies identified the negative impacts of peer-based interventions and they were mostly linked to lack of peer training, which suggested the importance of structured training given by the professionals to the peers [ 23 , 24 ]. Peer-intervention programs are also beneficial to peer mentors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%