Peer supervision experiences of drug sellers in a rural district in East-Central Uganda: a qualitative study

Abstract

Background: Support supervision improves performance outcomes among health workers. However, the national professional guidelines for new licenses and renewal for Class C drug shops in Uganda prescribe self-supervision of licensed private drug sellers. Without support supervision, inappropriate treatment of malaria, pneumonia and diarrhoea among children under 5 years of age continues unabated. This study assessed experiences of drug sellers and peer supervisors at the end of a peer supervision intervention in Luuka District in East Central Uganda. Methods: Eight in-depth interviews (IDIs) were held with peer supervisors while five focus group discussions (FGDs) were conducted among registered drug sellers at the end of the peer supervision intervention. The study assessed experiences and challenges of peer supervisors and drug sellers regarding peer supervision. Transcripts were imported into Atlas.ti 7 qualitative data management software where they were analysed using thematic content analysis. Results: Initially, peer supervisors were disliked and regarded by drug sellers as another extension of drug inspectors. However, with time a good relationship was established between drug sellers and peer supervisors leading to regular, predictable and supportive peer supervision. This increased confidence of drug sellers in using respiratory timers and rapid diagnostic tests in diagnosing pneumonia symptoms and uncomplicated malaria, respectively, among children under 5 years. There was also an improvement in completing the sick child register which was used for self-assessment by drug sellers. The drug shop association was mentioned as a place where peer supervision should be anchored since it was a one-stop centre for sharing experiences and continuous professional development. Drug sellers proposed including community health workers in monthly drug shop association meetings so that they may also gain from the associated benefits. Untimely completion of the sick child registers by drug sellers and inadequate financial resources were the main peer supervision challenges mentioned. Conclusion: Drug sellers benefitted from peer supervision by developing a good relationship with peer supervisors. This relationship guaranteed reliable and predictable supervision ultimately leading to improved treatment practices. There is need to explore the minimum resources needed for peer supervision of drug sellers to further inform practice and policy.

What are the challenges for antibiotic stewardship at the community level? An analysis of the drivers of antibiotic provision by informal healthcare providers in rural India

“…In high income countries, educational strategies combined with prescription restrictions and separation of dispensing from prescribing have helped control economic incentives for physician's prescribing ( Lim et al, 2019 ), but such a separation might be difficult to enforce in India given current business models. In LMICs, successful strategies with formal providers and drug sellers include knowledge enhancement, antibiotic guidelines and decision support, audit and review, peer supervision and performance-based incentives ( Bagonza et al, 2020 ; Wilkinson et al, 2018 ). Private sector literature also highlights the role of supply side interventions that address provider quality and incentives.…”

“If It Works in People, Why Not Animals?”: A Qualitative Investigation of Antibiotic Use in Smallholder Livestock Settings in Rural West Bengal, India

“…If disseminated and made available to a wider range of animal healthcare and antibiotic providers, such as formal and informal animal healthcare providers, IPs and drug shop owners, these could serve to raise awareness for judicious ABU. Similar antibiotic stewardship interventions have been conducted in human health settings with positive results [ 37 , 38 ]. Durrance–Bagal et al [ 39 ] and Swai et al (2010) [ 40 ] argue that a One Health approach involving human and animal healthcare providers as well as community members is necessary when developing interventions to mitigate the risk of zoonotic diseases.…”