2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.neucom.2021.12.105
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Peer selection in opinion dynamics on signed social networks with stubborn individuals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Corollary 1 points out that in a structurally balanced network, when the number of broadcasts tends to infinity, the followers in the camp that cooperated with the leader would tend to the leader's opinion, while the followers in the other camp would tend to the opposite value of the leader's opinion. This conclusion is consistent with the Theorem 1 in [34] and the Theorem 2 in [37].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Corollary 1 points out that in a structurally balanced network, when the number of broadcasts tends to infinity, the followers in the camp that cooperated with the leader would tend to the leader's opinion, while the followers in the other camp would tend to the opposite value of the leader's opinion. This conclusion is consistent with the Theorem 1 in [34] and the Theorem 2 in [37].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The authors established a necessary and sufficient condition, which ensure all opinions finally converge to bipartite consensus as long as the network topology is structurally balanced. In Reference 36, the authors examined an eigenvector‐based peer selection strategy and show how the strategy can be beneficial in the spreading efficiency of stubborn individuals' opinions. For the signed social networks with stubborn individuals, this strategy can ensure that the network achieves bipartite consensus.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the signed social networks with stubborn individuals, this strategy can ensure that the network achieves bipartite consensus. Although all followers' opinions reach bipartite consensus in References 34 and 36, the influence of leaders on followers is continuous and infinite. Corollary 1 shows that our results are consistent with the results of References 34 and 36 if the broadcasts are assumed to be continuous.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation