Peer Reviewers in Central Asia: Publons Based Analysis

Abstract

Background The five Central Asian republics comprise of Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan. Their research and publication activities are gradually improving but there is limited data on how good their peer reviewing practices are. Methods We have use the Publons database to extract information on the reviewers registered including the number of verified review, Publons award winners, and top universities in the domain of peer reviewing. This has been analysed overall and country wise. Results Of 15,764 researchers registered on Publons, only 370 (11.7%) have verified records of peer-reviewing. There are 8 Publons award winners. There is great heterogeneity in the number of active reviewers across the five countries. Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan account for more than 90% of verified reviewers. Only Kazakhstan has more than 100 active reviewers and 6 Publons award recipients. Amongst the top 20 reviewers from Central Asia, half of them are from the Nazarbayev University, Nur-Sultan, Kazakhstan. Three countries have less than 10 universities registered on Publons. Conclusion Central Asia has a good number of peer reviewers on Publons though only a minority of researchers are involved in peer reviewing. However, the heterogeneity between the nations can be best dealt with by promoting awareness and international networking including e-learning and mentoring programs.

Prejudice, Interests, Jealousy: Inappropriate Peer Reviewers May Be Exacerbating Inequality in Academic Publication in Health Research

“…Finally, it is also important to cultivate more reviewers. 19 20 Although editors prefer senior researchers when inviting reviewers, in the future we may have to face the fact that most journals can only ask early career researchers to review. So, what are the trainings for these young researchers, what are the forms of training, and how can the training effects be evaluated to help them grow quickly into qualified reviewers?…”

The Role of Publons in the Context of Open Peer Review

“…Using Publons-derived data, Ahmed and Yessirkepov [ 32 ] attempted to assess the peer review productivity of researchers in five countries in Central Asia (Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan), noting that only 11.7% of 15,764 researchers had verified peer-reviewing records, eight being Publons awards winners, with > 90% by researchers in Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan. Among nine Central Asian countries, in 1 year, China contributed the highest number of peer reviews (12,071 reviews from Zhejiang University alone), followed by Iran [ 33 ].…”

Identifying the characteristics of excellent peer reviewers by using Publons

“…Research performance could influence reviewers' understanding of the manuscripts they reviewed. The increase in the number of publications helped reviewers to carry out better peer review work (Ahmed and Yessirkepov, 2021). In general, researchers with high-quality publications (e.g.…”