1999
DOI: 10.1021/ac9904415
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Peer Reviewed: Advances in CE/MS.

Abstract: InterfacesThe quality of a CE separation depends on the CE running buffers, which typically possess high ionic strengths and components of low volatility. However, to obtain a strong and stable ESI signal,

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
104
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(104 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
104
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The major drawback is still the low capacity of standard CE systems, equipped with UV detectors to yield specific information about sample components. CE coupled with other detectors, such as CE-MS [132,151], CE-inductively coupled plasma (ICP)-MS [152,153], CE-NMR [154,155], CE-FTIR [156], CERaman [157,158], and CE-X-ray [159] is capable to provide more structural elucidation. At present, however, only the on-line MS technique has a sufficient detection sensitivity for structural identification.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The major drawback is still the low capacity of standard CE systems, equipped with UV detectors to yield specific information about sample components. CE coupled with other detectors, such as CE-MS [132,151], CE-inductively coupled plasma (ICP)-MS [152,153], CE-NMR [154,155], CE-FTIR [156], CERaman [157,158], and CE-X-ray [159] is capable to provide more structural elucidation. At present, however, only the on-line MS technique has a sufficient detection sensitivity for structural identification.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, as the sample becomes more complicated, MS provides a better alternative for CE detection owing to its high specificity, unambiguous identification of analytes, and m/z separation capability. There have been many practical methods to couple CE with mass spectrometer, and they can be divided into three major approaches: sheathless [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14], sheath flow [15][16][17], and liquid junction [18][19][20]. Because of its easiness of implementation, sheath flow interface is the method often used in commercial ESI sources.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Foremost is the robust transfer of analytes from the separations (CE) capillary to the inlet of the mass spectrometer via electrospray. Many different types of ESI interfaces have been reported for the coupling of CE to MS [18,[22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35]. In general they fall into three classes: (i) sheathless interfaces, wherein the separations capillary is connected directly to an electrospray emitter (tip), (ii) liquid-junction interfaces, where there is a small liquidfilled gap between the separations capillary and the emitter, and (iii) sheath-flow interfaces, wherein the end of the separations capillary is enclosed within another capillary through which flows a constant supply of sheath liquid.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%