2012
DOI: 10.5408/12-324.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Peer-Review of Digital Educational Resources—A Rigorous Review Process Developed by the Climate Literacy and Energy Awareness Network (CLEAN)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More than 42,000 people in 77 countries participated in World Climate between August 2015 and May 2018. World Climate has been externally reviewed by educators and scientists [ 61 ], found to support the US Next Generation Science Standards [ 62 ], and has been designated as an official resource for schools in Germany (Beule, personal communication), France [ 28 ] and South Korea [ 29 ]. We conclude that simulations like World Climate may offer a scalable means to catalyze climate action that is informed by science.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More than 42,000 people in 77 countries participated in World Climate between August 2015 and May 2018. World Climate has been externally reviewed by educators and scientists [ 61 ], found to support the US Next Generation Science Standards [ 62 ], and has been designated as an official resource for schools in Germany (Beule, personal communication), France [ 28 ] and South Korea [ 29 ]. We conclude that simulations like World Climate may offer a scalable means to catalyze climate action that is informed by science.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As well-organized learning materials positively impact student engagement and higher-order learning ( 19 ), consistency templates, and peer review – a fundamental component of the dissemination of knowledge ( 20 ) and academic development ( 21 ) – are used to assure the quality of course resources. Course content and sites are developed using a template that assures a professional, consistent, easy-to-navigate structure, and embeds sound andragogical approaches to encourage active learning, which improves students’ learning outcomes ( 22 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We hoped to find guidance about evaluating images for quality or adaptability, the presence of georeferenced objects, and attention to geoscience nomenclature. Though we did not find any literature addressing these concepts specifically, the literature did present a compelling suggestion for incorporating robust peer review into the evaluation of digital educational resources (Gold et al, 2012). The paper presents a model for peer review of digital earth science resources and examines the differences between how print and digital textbooks are adopted.…”
Section: Standards and Guidelinesmentioning
confidence: 90%