1991
DOI: 10.2307/358198
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Peer Review and Revising in an Anthropology Course: Lessons for Learning

Abstract: I didn't have that much criticism of the actual material so I added to that. Penny's paper was different from mine. She didn't really provide as much of a summary of what was in the book as she did an analysis. So I said, I think I should add some. She went the other way. Tom had told me that I needed to put in some questions [about needed research in the future). I didn't know why I really needed to do that. ... It fit in Tom's paper because he wasn't able to do as much with his study. I got basically what I … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many studies have been conducted to endorse the effectiveness of peer revision. It is a suggested way of monitoring writing process, negotiating meaning, encouraging collaborative learning and cultivating audience awareness (Chase & Hynd, 1987; Herrington & Cadman, 1991; Tsui & Ng, 2000). L1 and L2 research on peer revision has centred on three major issues: effectiveness of peer feedback, students’ ability to provide useful feedback that may lead to improved writing and students’ perceptions towards peer revision (Davies & Omberg, 1986; Hvitfeldt, 1986; Mendonca & Johnson, 1994).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies have been conducted to endorse the effectiveness of peer revision. It is a suggested way of monitoring writing process, negotiating meaning, encouraging collaborative learning and cultivating audience awareness (Chase & Hynd, 1987; Herrington & Cadman, 1991; Tsui & Ng, 2000). L1 and L2 research on peer revision has centred on three major issues: effectiveness of peer feedback, students’ ability to provide useful feedback that may lead to improved writing and students’ perceptions towards peer revision (Davies & Omberg, 1986; Hvitfeldt, 1986; Mendonca & Johnson, 1994).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These studies generally used tape-recordings of student discussions during peer revision as data. Qualitative studies have also examined the influences of peer feedback on students' revisions (Connor & Asenavage, 1994;Herrington & Cadman, 1991;Mendonca & Johnson, 1994;Nelson & Murphy, 1993) and students' reactions to peer revision (Carson & Nelson, 1996;Jacobs, 1987;Mangelsdorf, 1992). Unfortunately, utilizing a single method, data source, or measurement precludes internal validation of the findings.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…I benefited greatly from this innovation: I no longer had to read term papers that were written the night before they were due or had not been edited or spell-checked. (For examples of other instructors' experiences with peer review and revision, see DiPardo and Freedman 1988;Herrington and Cadman 1991;Norman and Young 1985;and O'Donnell 1985. ) Students' reaction to the innovations have been largely positive.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Active learning strategies are now being employed in disciplines such as history (Bailey and Eggleston 1987), psychology (Benjamin 1991), sociology (Hamil and Janssen 1987), anthropology (Herrington and Cadman 1991;Nanda 1985), ethics (Hunt 1982), as well as education (Prescott and Wolff 1990). Criminology may be particularly suited to active learning.…”
Section: Active Learning Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%