1972
DOI: 10.1037/h0033189
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Peer ratings of practicum counselors.

Abstract: Peer ratings of counselors in a graduate practicum were explored. First, the associations between peer rankings on three different dimensions (competency, knowledge, and likability) were determined. Second, the intellective and nonintellective characteristics of counselors chosen and rejected by their peers were analyzed. A close association between the three sets of rankings was observed. The nature and direction of the differences between the subjects ranked in the highest and lowest quarters by their peers … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

1973
1973
1990
1990

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The female counselor candidates, on the other hand, were much less differentiated on the non intellective variables from their peers in supervision or teaching than the males were. The magnitude and direction of the observed significant differences between female groups in the present study showed only slight similarity to differences reported earlier between females ranked high and low in overall competence by graduate faculty (Jansen, Robb & Bonk 1970) and by peers (Jansen, Robb & Bonk 1972). In those studies, the sociability, emotional stability, and objectivity scales of the GZTS and the MTAI clearly distinguished between females ranked high and low in counseling competence.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The female counselor candidates, on the other hand, were much less differentiated on the non intellective variables from their peers in supervision or teaching than the males were. The magnitude and direction of the observed significant differences between female groups in the present study showed only slight similarity to differences reported earlier between females ranked high and low in overall competence by graduate faculty (Jansen, Robb & Bonk 1970) and by peers (Jansen, Robb & Bonk 1972). In those studies, the sociability, emotional stability, and objectivity scales of the GZTS and the MTAI clearly distinguished between females ranked high and low in counseling competence.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Male counselor candidates appeared to differ significantly from their counterparts in noncounseling fields on the same personality dimensions which differentiated male counselors who were ranked high and low in competence by their peers (Jansen, Robb & Bonk 1972). The high-ranked male counselors in that study were observed to be significantly more emotionally stable and to be significantly more adroit in interpersonal relations than low-ranked males.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Thus, the high rated counselors appeared to be more alert and sensitive, more anxious to please others, more yielding to the demands of others and more open to change than their low rated counterparts. Jansen, Robb and Bonk (1970) suggested that there were significant intellective, non-intellective and achievement differences between female counselors rated in the top quarter in terms of overall competence in their prospective evaluation seminars and those rated in the bottom quarter. The high rated counselors emerged as significantly younger and more intellectually capable than their low rated counterparts.…”
Section: Counselor Competenciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A significant correlation between counselor self-ratings on the Counseling Evaluation Inventory and supervisor ratings on the same instrument exists (Bishop, 1971), suggesting the possibility of teaching self-evaluation skills as part of the supervisoy process. Although peer ratings have been found to be valid (Jansen, Robb, & Bonk, 1972), peer evaluations on the Rating Scale of Counselor Effectiveness are consistently higher than supervisor evaluations (Friesen & Dunning, 1973). Additionally, supervisor ratings of competence correlate more highly with the Guilford-Zimmerman Temperament Survey than do peer ratings (Bonk & Jansen, 1974).…”
Section: The Practicummentioning
confidence: 99%