1991
DOI: 10.1159/000266098
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Peer Perceptions of Normal and Voice-Disordered Children

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
25
0
1

Year Published

1991
1991
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
4
25
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…1 Specifically, dysphonic children were judged more negatively than their nondysphonic peers on all but two bipolar comparisons of physical and personality characteristics, such as ''dirty-clean,'' ''bad-good,'' ''cruel-kind,'' ''worthless-valuable,'' ''dishonest-honest,'' ''sick-healthy,'' ''sad-happy,'' and ''wrong-right.'' 1 Very similar results were found when normal-speaking children (ages 9-11 years) served as judges, 2 and also for children with Down syndrome. 3 It can be inferred from these reports that voice disruptions have a negative effect on how children are perceived by adults and by their peers.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 52%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1 Specifically, dysphonic children were judged more negatively than their nondysphonic peers on all but two bipolar comparisons of physical and personality characteristics, such as ''dirty-clean,'' ''bad-good,'' ''cruel-kind,'' ''worthless-valuable,'' ''dishonest-honest,'' ''sick-healthy,'' ''sad-happy,'' and ''wrong-right.'' 1 Very similar results were found when normal-speaking children (ages 9-11 years) served as judges, 2 and also for children with Down syndrome. 3 It can be inferred from these reports that voice disruptions have a negative effect on how children are perceived by adults and by their peers.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…These age groupings coincided with those from the PedsQL 4.0, a validated measure of general HR-QOL. 23,30 Inclusion criteria included: (1) presence of at least mild dysphonia, as assessed by a speech-language pathologist, for at least the previous 6 months, (2) cognitive and/or language skills that allow responses to structured interviews or written questionnaires, although limited responses by toddlers were considered acceptable, (3) effective speakers of English, and (4) free from other comorbid conditions at time of interview. Prior voice treatment or medical/surgical management for laryngeal diseases or disorders was not exclusionary.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 Furthermore, it has been shown that childhood dysphonia has an adverse effect on the listener's perception of the child: they are judged more negatively with regard to their physical appearance, their personality, and their cognitive skills by peers and adolescent and adult judges. [10][11][12] The results from a recent study involving teachers as judges go in the same direction. 13 This can, of course, have adverse educational and psychosocial implications for the child.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…To date no studies have formally evaluated the impact of vocal problems on children's listening and learning performance. There is some evidence that pupils may react more negatively to a teacher who has impaired vocal quality compared with one with normal voice (5,18,28). Just like background noise, hoarseness, commonly referred to as dysphonia, may contribute negatively by reducing pupils' attention span and concentration, thereby adversely affecting their listening and learning ability (17).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%