2004
DOI: 10.1080/0309877042000206778
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Peer observation: a tool for staff development or compliance?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
94
0
4

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 120 publications
(106 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
5
94
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…It may be that this detailed process of teacher development is not suitable for all foundation doctors, just those with a particular interest in the field of medical education. This argument is given credence by Shortland (2004) who found that, when peer observation was introduced on a compulsory university wide basis, staff did not engage with it fully with a desire to change their teaching practice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It may be that this detailed process of teacher development is not suitable for all foundation doctors, just those with a particular interest in the field of medical education. This argument is given credence by Shortland (2004) who found that, when peer observation was introduced on a compulsory university wide basis, staff did not engage with it fully with a desire to change their teaching practice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data was analysed in three stages (Shortland, 2004;Guest et al 2011). Observations were analysed to look into the patterns of questioning and to provide a richer understanding of individual knowledge and the methods of questioning.…”
Section: Selecting Data and Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This instrument not only gives detailed information that happens within the sessions of intervention of the programme, but also improvement plans for the teacher´s performance can be introduced through the analysis (Wankat & Oreovicz, 1993;Cosser, 1998;Shortland, 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%