2017
DOI: 10.1080/2331186x.2016.1277456
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Peer observation: A key factor to improve Iranian EFL teachers’ professional development

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
24
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
3
24
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This result highlighted the role of reflection in improving teachers' self-efficacy. Also, reflective teaching has been considered as an effective way to develop and empower teachers (Motallebzadeh, Hosseinnia, & Domskey, 2016). So, from this aspect it can be related with CPD.…”
Section: Review Of the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This result highlighted the role of reflection in improving teachers' self-efficacy. Also, reflective teaching has been considered as an effective way to develop and empower teachers (Motallebzadeh, Hosseinnia, & Domskey, 2016). So, from this aspect it can be related with CPD.…”
Section: Review Of the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, it is said that PO is a technique which provides chances to teachers in order to reflect, think critically and get feedback. Consequently, it helps teachers to collaborate and share the learning experiences which can be beneficial for both the observer and observee (Motallebzadeh, et al, 2017).…”
Section: Peer Observationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be challenging for teachers to write down critical reflection, explore successful and unsuccessful teaching experiences and provide and accept feedback (Bell, 2005). Similarly, Motallebzadeh, et al (2017) posits that PO lead to anxiety and lack of confidence with someone observe and examine your performance with critical views. This challenge can be addressed amicably if mutual trust is there among teachers.…”
Section: Peer Observationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Low-stakes because it would move away from models that are threatening (Richards & Lockhart, 1991), anxiety-driven (Crookes, 2003), and prescriptive (Williams, 1989); and discussion-based because it could then be used as a tool for growth (Malderez, 2003), and reflection (Santos, 2016). Such a process is preferred by teachers over other kinds of observation (Motallebzadeh, et al, 2017), and could be implemented following stages akin to Goldhammer (1969) which would see: (1) teacher and observer pre-observation discussion, followed by (2) clinical supervision and observer analysis of the lesson, with outcomes then negotiated with the teacher in a (3) post-observation discussion, prior to (4) teacher post-conference self-reflection of their craft. Consequently, to determine what Korea-based NES stakeholders regard as essential elements for the development of such a COP at the tertiary level, the central research questions are:…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%