2020
DOI: 10.36834/cmej.68751
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Peer mentoring in medical residency education: A systematic review

Abstract: Background: Medical residents may experience burnout during their training, and a lack of social support. This can impact their overall wellbeing and ability to master key professional competencies. We explored, in this study, the extent to which peer mentorship promotes psychosocial wellbeing and the development of professional competencies in medical residency education. Methods: We searched six databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Academic Research Complete, ERIC, Education Research Complete) for stu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
18
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The quality of published articles was evaluated using the (JBI) Critical appraisal checklist for analytical cross-sectional studies [ 53 ]. This checklist has eight questions that inquiries about inclusion criteria, subjects, and settings, validity and reliability of exposure measurements, standard criteria used for measurement of the condition, confounding factors, strategies to deal with confounding factors, validity and reliability of outcome measurements and appropriate statistical analysis [ 54 ]. Answers include yes, no, unclear, and not applicable.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The quality of published articles was evaluated using the (JBI) Critical appraisal checklist for analytical cross-sectional studies [ 53 ]. This checklist has eight questions that inquiries about inclusion criteria, subjects, and settings, validity and reliability of exposure measurements, standard criteria used for measurement of the condition, confounding factors, strategies to deal with confounding factors, validity and reliability of outcome measurements and appropriate statistical analysis [ 54 ]. Answers include yes, no, unclear, and not applicable.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When possible, time working with electronic medical records can be de-emphasized relative to time spent with patients and peers, as the latter is more likely to contribute to meaningful PIF and in turn, a sense of wellbeing. Peer mentorship programs have also been shown to be valuable, contributing to a sense of collegiality, and heightening social resilience (i.e., enabling trainees to withstand stress through mutual trust and bonding) (Pethrick et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Supporting Wellness Through Professional Identity Formationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also helpful in developing specific skills beyond clinical surgery, such as skills in research, scholarship, leadership, and administration. Mentoring among peers can be helpful for both professional and personal growth; such peer mentoring has been successfully implemented in both residency programs and practice settings 41,42 . Coaching may be used to refine existing skills, but has a limited role during residency training.…”
Section: Application Of Special Educational Interventions Across the Continuum Of Professional Development In Surgerymentioning
confidence: 99%