2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.rasd.2014.10.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Peer-mediated discrete trial training within a school setting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
17
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
5
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The decrease in disruptive behavior observed in the current study may have been because the intervention provided differential reinforcement for a behavior that was incompatible with disruptive behavior (i.e., attending to the teacher). Previous research investigating group contingencies targeting AEB has achieved similar results when utilizing differential reinforcement for incompatible behavior procedures (e.g., Radley et al, 2015 and the current findings add to this base of literature; however, it is interesting to note that the off-task and inattentive behavior of students was largely unchanged across classrooms once the Classroom Password intervention was implemented.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The decrease in disruptive behavior observed in the current study may have been because the intervention provided differential reinforcement for a behavior that was incompatible with disruptive behavior (i.e., attending to the teacher). Previous research investigating group contingencies targeting AEB has achieved similar results when utilizing differential reinforcement for incompatible behavior procedures (e.g., Radley et al, 2015 and the current findings add to this base of literature; however, it is interesting to note that the off-task and inattentive behavior of students was largely unchanged across classrooms once the Classroom Password intervention was implemented.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Tau‐U evaluates the nonoverlap data between phases while considering the trend in data, which allows for a more conservative estimate of intervention effects (Parker et al., ). Previous researchers have used guidelines for interpretation of NAP for interpretation of Tau‐U (e.g., Radley, Dart, Furlow, & Ness, ). Although no guidelines have been published for interpreting Tau‐U, use of NAP guidelines may be considered appropriate as both effect sizes are derived through a Mann–Whitney U test (Vannest, Parker, & Gonen, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One systematic strategy derived from ABA is Discrete Trial Training (DTT). This intervention includes instruction from the therapist, response by the learner, and a punishment or reinforcement facilitated by the therapist (Radley, Dart, Furlow, & Ness, 2015). For example, a therapist may break a desired skill into smaller components for the client until they can effectively master the entire skill.…”
Section: Applied Behavioral Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tau-U involves pairwise comparison of all data points in baseline and treatment conditions, creating a statistic between 0.00 and 1.00 that represents the percentage of improvement between conditions . While standard guidelines for interpreting Tau-U have not been established, because Tau-U is similar to but more conservative than Nonoverlap of All Pairs (Parker & Vannest, 2009), researchers have considered guidelines for the latter statistic to be sufficient (e.g., O'Handley, Radley, & Whipple, 2015;Radley, Dart, Furlow, & Ness, 2015). I used those guidelines for interpreting Tau-U, so I considered effect sizes between 0.00 and 0.65 to be weak effects, between 0.66 and 0.91 to be moderate effects, and between 0.92 and 1.00 to be strong effects (Parker & Vannest, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%