2012
DOI: 10.1187/cbe.12-04-0042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Peer Learning and Support of Technology in an Undergraduate Biology Course to Enhance Deep Learning

Abstract: This study offers an innovative and sustainable instructional model for an introductory undergraduate course. The model was gradually implemented during 3 yr in a research university in a large-lecture biology course that enrolled biology majors and nonmajors. It gives priority to sources not used enough to enhance active learning in higher education: technology and the students themselves. Most of the lectures were replaced with continuous individual learning and 1-mo group learning of one topic, both support… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, grade point average is only one way of measuring students' study success, and it does not necessarily measure the quality of the learning outcomes (Räisänen, Tuononen, & Postareff, 2012). For example, it has been found that final exams in biology classes do not necessarily measure students' understanding of the subject matter (Tsaushu et al, 2012). However, the weak relationship between study success and deep approach has been found in other recent studies at university level (Diseth, 2007a;Diseth, 2007b;Trigwell, Ashwin, & Millan, 2013).…”
Section: Predicting Study Successmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In addition, grade point average is only one way of measuring students' study success, and it does not necessarily measure the quality of the learning outcomes (Räisänen, Tuononen, & Postareff, 2012). For example, it has been found that final exams in biology classes do not necessarily measure students' understanding of the subject matter (Tsaushu et al, 2012). However, the weak relationship between study success and deep approach has been found in other recent studies at university level (Diseth, 2007a;Diseth, 2007b;Trigwell, Ashwin, & Millan, 2013).…”
Section: Predicting Study Successmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This indicated to us that the students were engaged in the research process and invested on the outcome of the project. They were becoming “deep learners” and not just focused on getting a good grade for the course.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context, the literature provides interesting examples, all reporting good results for learning: i) restructuring of contents by adoption of comprehensive themes and active learning settings [42,43]; ii) support by tutorials and open-ended questions [44]; iii) use of problems or questions especially built to facilitate the teaching of complex and interdisciplinary issues [45,46]. The novelty of the present research is the detailed record of development, application, refinement, and reapplication of teaching materials which implies both individual immersion and cooperative work group, based on hardly ever addressed themes in textbooks and/or scientific articles with didactic purposes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%