2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.system.2022.102722
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Peer interaction, writing proficiency, and the quality of collaborative digital multimodal composing task: Comparing guided and unguided planning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(2014) (see the Appendix for the rubric from Kim et al. (2022)). Because different genres were used across tasks in the current study, the analytic rubric was modified accordingly for each task.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…(2014) (see the Appendix for the rubric from Kim et al. (2022)). Because different genres were used across tasks in the current study, the analytic rubric was modified accordingly for each task.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, assessing DMC has been a challenge because meaning construction through DMC is accomplished by the use of multiple semiotic tools such as linguistic, visual, and auditory modes rather than the sole use of linguistic mode (Kang & Kim, 2021). Previous research that examined quality of DMC has focused on evaluating different aspects of the final project (Hsieh, 2021; Hsieh & Lee, 2021; Hung et al., 2013; Kang & Kim, 2021; Kim & Kang, 2020; Kim et al., 2022). A variety of elements assessed through a rubric include language‐related factors (grammar, vocabulary, pronunciation, organization, content, and mechanics), multimodality‐related factors (e.g., multimodal design), delivery (e.g., pace), and task‐related factors (e.g., task fulfillment).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To identify valid, evidence-based task design options for DMC, it will be useful to first conceptualise DMC task and its design. With reference to previous work on DMC tasks (Hafner, 2013;Kim et al, 2022), the concept of a DMC task can be defined as a task in which L2 learners construct meanings by incorporating various modes of communication. The task outcome can include a variety of genres, from digital video scientific documentaries to infographics.…”
Section: Research Taskmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a cross-disciplinary field, DMC research has drawn upon diverse theoretical perspectives (e.g., linguistics, applied linguistics, education, and multimedia communication), with 72% of studies having clearly stated their theoretical underpinnings. Of all the theoretical frameworks, the social semiotic theory of multimodality (e.g., Hafner, 2020; Jocius, 2018; Lim & Nguyen, 2022) [16][17][18] and multiliteracies (e.g., Dahlström, 2021;Maghsoudi et al, 2022) [19][20] [24][25][26] and concepts or approaches in second language acquisition like investment and engagement (e.g., Jiang & Luk, 2016;Jiang et al, 2020aJiang et al, , 2020b [27][28][29] and task-based language teaching (e.g., Kim et al, 2022) [30]. Translanguaging, i.e.…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%