2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.bodyim.2010.06.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Peer-facilitated cognitive dissonance versus healthy weight eating disorders prevention: A randomized comparison

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

11
117
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 107 publications
(130 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
11
117
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The timing of the current study at the end of the academic year did not allow this. However, benchmarking against other trials, the pre to post change in body dissatisfaction found here, d = .73, is comparable to pre to post effect sizes reported for body satisfaction in other studies using peer-led intervention among university women, d = .50, (Becker et al, 2010) and d = .84, (Stice, Rohde, Durant, Shaw & Wade, 2013). The majority of the research in this area assesses immediate post-intervention effects collecting questionnaires directly after the intervention session (Yager et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The timing of the current study at the end of the academic year did not allow this. However, benchmarking against other trials, the pre to post change in body dissatisfaction found here, d = .73, is comparable to pre to post effect sizes reported for body satisfaction in other studies using peer-led intervention among university women, d = .50, (Becker et al, 2010) and d = .84, (Stice, Rohde, Durant, Shaw & Wade, 2013). The majority of the research in this area assesses immediate post-intervention effects collecting questionnaires directly after the intervention session (Yager et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…A 1-hour CDI led to reduction in body dissatifaction and improved body appreciation. Moreover, the effect sizes were moderate to large and are comparable to the effect sizes reported in peer-led intervention studies among university women (Becker et al, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Two, only a small proportion of the preventive intervention studies produced so far have moved beyond the efficacy trial stage to be evaluated in effectiveness (Austin et al, 2007;Becker, Smith, & Ciao, 2006;Becker et al, 2010;Matusek, Wendt, & Wiseman, 2004;Perez, Becker, & Ramirez, 2010;Stice et al, 2013) and dissemination Kilpela et al, 2014) studies. Large-scale impact of behavioral interventions on population health necessitates progression through the phases of evaluation from efficacy to effectiveness to dissemination (Brownson & Jones, 2009;Flay, 1986;Glasgow, Lichtenstein, & Marcus, 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although many of these trials were limited by shorter follow-ups (i.e., 1-8 months), in an effectiveness trial with 14-month follow-up, Becker et al (2010) found both a similar pattern of effects relative to an active control and similar within-group effect sizes compared with Stice et al's (2006) efficacy RCT at 12 months. Notably, delivery of the Body Project can be task shifted to undergraduate peer leaders, markedly increasing its scalability (Becker et al, 2006(Becker et al, , 2008Perez, Becker, & Ramirez, 2010;Stice, Rohde, Durant, Shaw, & Wade, 2013;Stice, Rohde, Shaw, & Gau, 2016).…”
Section: The Mission Of the Association For Behavioral Andmentioning
confidence: 88%