Peer Evaluation of Teaching in an Online Information Literacy Course

García, Susan A. Vega; Stacy-Bates, Kristine K.; Alger, Jeff; Marupova, Rano

doi:10.1353/pla.2017.0030

Cited by 8 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 11 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Assuming that the relative membership degree of decision j to the best is represented by u j , the fuzzy optimization model of the unit system is deduced as [34,35] 3 Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing…”

Section: Comprehensive Evaluation Of Teaching Ability Levelmentioning

confidence: 99%

[Retracted] Comprehensive Evaluation of Teaching Ability Based on Network Communication Environment

Chen

Li³

2021

Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

With the continuous development of school teaching quality, the measurement of the current teaching ability level has become a concern of people. This research mainly discusses the comprehensive evaluation of the teaching ability level based on the network communication environment. This study uses fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method to comprehensively evaluate the system. First, obtain the representative evaluation standards of education informatization and a series of indicators related to informatization teaching at home and abroad; secondly, conduct a comprehensive analysis of the various evaluation standards and related indicators of informatization teaching that have been obtained; finally, the process in each indicator is discussed and revised by experts and relevant information technology teachers, and a number of schools are selected to conduct small-scale experimental evaluation experiments to form information-based teaching evaluation indicators. In this study, the proportion method is used to calculate the membership degree of each observation index based on the recovered data and establish the fuzzy relationship matrix of each evaluation factor. Paying attention to the level of index weights can guide the development direction of informatization teaching and promote the healthy development of informatization teaching. Therefore, this article uses the expert scoring method combined with the analytic hierarchy process to determine the weights in the evaluation index system. There is a significant difference between teachers in urban areas and teachers in rural areas ( p < 0.05 ). The ratio of each grade of the teacher’s informatization teaching ability comment collection is “bad 0.5%,” “relatively poor 5.7%,” “normal 35.3%,” “good 53.1%,” and “excellent 5.3%.” This research will help promote the improvement of school teaching quality.

show abstract

Section: Comprehensive Evaluation Of Teaching Ability Levelmentioning

confidence: 99%

[Retracted] Comprehensive Evaluation of Teaching Ability Based on Network Communication Environment

Chen

Li³

2021

Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The data shows that the performance values changes in each phase are not the same (the greatest improvement occurred in the period between the time before the training to the first phase of practice transference), which may mean the evaluation process needs to be refined and continued over a longer period to determine the most appropriate practice transference period. There is reference significance for the faculty development and training research projects in the Residency Standardized Training in the future to incorporating peer evaluation [ 33 – 36 ] (such as teaching secretaries) into teaching practices. Considering that the presence of a teaching secretary may cause clinical teachers to pay more attention to their teaching and preparation for the lectures, Shanghai East Hospital has begun to try to incorporate teaching secretaries as observers into regular teaching activities, and encouraged them to carry out peer evaluation.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…There is reference significance for the faculty development and training research projects in the Residency Standardized Training in the future to incorporating peer evaluation [ 33 – 36 ] (such as teaching secretaries) into teaching practices.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A case study: a continuous improvement project of lecturing skills for clinical teachers in Chinese residency standardized training

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Aiming at the poor quality of small lectures due to the lack of lecturing skills of the clinical teachers in residency standardized training, the Teaching and Training Department of Shanghai East Hospital set up a continuous improvement project of lecturing skills for the clinical teachers to search for effective ways to improve lecture quality, then the effect was evaluated. Methods Based on the ADDIE model of training design, the department conducted the project in accordance with a process of analysis, design, development, implementation and evaluation. A special course “Clinical Teacher Presentation Training” (CTPT) was developed to convey and train the 5 key behaviors in presentation to improving lecture quality of the clinical teachers. Ninety-nine clinical teachers who give lectures to the residents were recruited as subjects for the project. Adopted the model of “intensive training + practice transference” to strengthen lecturing skills, and applied the Kirkpatrick Four Levels to evaluate the effect of the project from multi-role and multi-stage. Results The training satisfaction of the CTPT course from the subjects reaches 100%. The subjects have a high degree of knowledge acquisition through CTPT and the knowledge of the 5 key behaviors has been actually used in their lectures at the stage of practice transference. Comparing the data before training and after transference, it is found that the average increasing of the subjects’ 5 key behavior scores made by teaching secretaries is 14.12 points (14.12%) and that of the subjects’ self-efficacy scores is 9.31 points (9.31%); the performance values were modeling based on the scores from different types of evaluators and increased by an average of 12.61 points (12.61%); and the star ratings of the overall performance increased by an average of 1.17 points (23.4%). The results showed statistically difference (P < 0.001). Conclusions The project effectively promoted the improvement of the clinical teachers’ lecturing skills and the quality of small lectures.

show abstract

“…This rich data allows peer reviewers to see aspects of a course that are largely unseen in face‐to‐face course sessions but explodes the scope of content for the reviewer to “observe”. Furthermore, the type of available data in an online course is also different (Gaskamp & Kintner, 2014; Vega García et al., 2017). Online course reviews tend to emphasize course design issues—how clear and easy to understand are the instructions and learning materials?…”

Section: Course Modality and Peer Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluating instructor quality: Moving away from student evaluations to peer review

Quenette

Rybas

2023

New Drctns for Teach & Learn

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Peer Evaluation of Teaching in an Online Information Literacy Course

Cited by 8 publications

References 11 publications

[Retracted] Comprehensive Evaluation of Teaching Ability Based on Network Communication Environment

[Retracted] Comprehensive Evaluation of Teaching Ability Based on Network Communication Environment

A case study: a continuous improvement project of lecturing skills for clinical teachers in Chinese residency standardized training

Evaluating instructor quality: Moving away from student evaluations to peer review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About