1996
DOI: 10.1080/87567555.1996.9932346
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Peer Coaching for Better Teaching

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It seems that peers observers feel uncomfortable providing such an assessment due to their equal and collegial position. Their experiences of discomfort may be congruent with those reported on by Skinner and Welch (1996) who argue that peer observation, or as they term 'peer coaching', is supposed to be non-evaluative because 'evaluative coaching destroys the collegial collaboration that is the heart of the process' (p. 154). Furthermore, evaluative assessment may apply in a performance model where a supervisor's observation may be used to judge the praktikans' teaching skills.…”
Section: 'Being An Observer Is Problematic': Peer Feedback In Pt1 Classsupporting
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It seems that peers observers feel uncomfortable providing such an assessment due to their equal and collegial position. Their experiences of discomfort may be congruent with those reported on by Skinner and Welch (1996) who argue that peer observation, or as they term 'peer coaching', is supposed to be non-evaluative because 'evaluative coaching destroys the collegial collaboration that is the heart of the process' (p. 154). Furthermore, evaluative assessment may apply in a performance model where a supervisor's observation may be used to judge the praktikans' teaching skills.…”
Section: 'Being An Observer Is Problematic': Peer Feedback In Pt1 Classsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Meanwhile, evidence from other studies outside of Indonesia suggest that peer observation is more effective when it is a non-evaluative process (cf. Goker, 2006;Skinner & Welch, 1996). It seems that peers observers feel uncomfortable providing such an assessment due to their equal and collegial position.…”
Section: 'Being An Observer Is Problematic': Peer Feedback In Pt1 Classmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some teams may not use classroom observation, but instead review instructional materials or grading practices (Chism 1999;Malik 1996;Millis 1999;Skinner and Welch 1996).…”
Section: Peer Coaching: One Model Of How It Can Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many articles document the general benefits of peer coaching programs (also referred to as peer mentoring): improved faculty morale and motivation, increased collaborations with other faculty members, and more thoughtful attention to one's pedagogical choices (e.g. Brancato 2003;Menges 1987;Skinner and Welch 1996). This literature, however, often focuses on the benefits of these relationships for junior faculty and/or for faculty collaborations within a single department.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Co-inquirers Skinner and Welch (1996), Peer Review of Teaching at IPFW (2005) Both parties are engaged in investigating answers to their own questions and assist each other through reciprocal critical reflection on multiple aspects of their practice. As in the researcher/subject model, conclusions must be based on evidence.…”
Section: Mental Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%