2017
DOI: 10.1136/jnnp-2016-315192
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Peduncolopontine nucleus stimulation in progressive supranuclear palsy: a randomised trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is an unusual subgroup, perhaps comprising around 5% of patients with PD . Indeed, some of these patients may later declare features of an atypical parkinsonian disorder . Patients with medication responsive freezing and motor fluctuations are candidates for established therapies such as STN or GPi DBS …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is an unusual subgroup, perhaps comprising around 5% of patients with PD . Indeed, some of these patients may later declare features of an atypical parkinsonian disorder . Patients with medication responsive freezing and motor fluctuations are candidates for established therapies such as STN or GPi DBS …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…58,64 Deep brain stimulation of the pedunculopontine nucleus has been attempted in advanced PSP-RS, however there were no clear benefits observed and unacceptable side effects. 65 …”
Section: Therapeutics (Table 2)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of these, 62 articles were identi ed as irrelevant literatures based on their titles and abstracts and were therefore eliminated. Among 32 potentially relevant articles, 10 were excluded because they were the abstracts of poster presentations; patients from 5 articles [27][28][29][30][31] overlapped with those in other studies [21,32] and these 5 articles were excluded; 4 articles [33][34][35][36] had no extracted data and were excluded. 13 articles were nally included in the analysis containing 36 PSP patients: 32 with PPN-DBS, 1 with STN-DBS, 1 with GPi-DBS, 2 with compound DBS.…”
Section: Description Of Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, 3 studies mentioned the adverse events about DBS. Intraoperative bleeding is a major surgical adverse event and it occurred in 2 patients with unknown reasons [32]. Other surgical adverse events included apathy and a buccofacial apraxia, which were transient and recoverable [20].…”
Section: Other Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%