2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2004.04.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pedodiversity-area relationships for islands

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
45
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
3
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The study of area-geodiversity relationships is a relatively new área of research that has concentrated mainly on areapedodiversity relationships. The results of these studies have proved the fractal nature of pedodiversity (see Ibáñez et al, 2005Ibáñez et al, , 2009Ibáñez and Bockheim, 2013) analogous to what has been found in studies of species abundance and diversity in ecology (Harte et al, 1999;May, 1975;Sugihara and May, 1990). In contrast, the relationships between soil and vegetation have long been of interest to researchers (e.g., Duchaufour, 1998;Pugnaire et al, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…The study of area-geodiversity relationships is a relatively new área of research that has concentrated mainly on areapedodiversity relationships. The results of these studies have proved the fractal nature of pedodiversity (see Ibáñez et al, 2005Ibáñez et al, , 2009Ibáñez and Bockheim, 2013) analogous to what has been found in studies of species abundance and diversity in ecology (Harte et al, 1999;May, 1975;Sugihara and May, 1990). In contrast, the relationships between soil and vegetation have long been of interest to researchers (e.g., Duchaufour, 1998;Pugnaire et al, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…The same pattern has been observed in biodiversity studies for islands (MacArthur and Wilson 1967;May, 1975). Power law scalings of pedorichness-area relationships were first conjectured by Ibáñez and de Alba (2000) for earth soil systems and they have been reported for different soil classifications and geographical units (Ibáñez et al, 2005a;Caniego et al, 2005). They may be interpreted as indicators of the selfsimilarity of the pedorichness spatial distribution.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Power -law scalings of pedorichness-area relationships were first conjectured by Ibáñez and De Alba (2000) for earth soil systems and they have been reported for different soil classifications and geographical units (Guo et al, 2003a;Phillips, 2004;Ibáñez et al, 2004Ibáñez et al, , 2005a. They may also be interpreted in terms of the selfsimilarity of the pedorichness spatial distribution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Therefore, in a broader sense, we are concerned with richness-area relationships and abundance distributions, so that there are biorichnessarea relationships and biotaxa-abundance distributions, in macroecology, and pedorichness-area relationships and pedotaxa-abundance distributions in pedology. These concepts have been applied to soils (Ibáñez et al, 1995(Ibáñez et al, , 1998(Ibáñez et al, , 2005aPhillips, 2001;Guo et al, 2003a;Phillips, 2004), considering the extension of each soil type (taxon) within a region, just as an area covered by plant communities is evaluated when analyzing biodiversity in vegetation biology (Magurran, 1988). It has been found that biotic and abiotic resources follow similar patterns at different regional scales (Ibáñez et al, 1990(Ibáñez et al, , 1995(Ibáñez et al, , 1998Guo et al, 2003a;Phillips, 2004;Ibáñez et al, 2005a) and also at the planetary scale (Ibáñez et al, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%