2010
DOI: 10.1097/sap.0b013e3181b4bc70
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pedicled Anterolateral Thigh Flap

Abstract: Reconstruction of extensive oncosurgical defects of lower trunk, perineum and upper thigh, without the complexity of microsurgery, is a reconstructive challenge. Pedicled anterolateral thigh (ALT) flap offers many advantages over other regional flaps for this purpose, such as the large skin and soft tissue availability, the remarkable pedicle length and the reliability. However, there is paucity of literature describing the utility of pedicled ALT flaps for reconstruction of these difficult soft tissue defects… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A total of 10 flaps were osteomyocutaneous and 19 were myocutaneous. The mean vertical size of the harvested skin paddle was 30.72 ± 4.57 cm (range: [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38], and the mean horizontal size of the skin paddle was 8.69 ± 0.80 (range: 7-10) cm, with the mean maximum horizontal extensions of the flaps being 16.03 ± 1.18 (range: 14-18) cm. The flap survival rates were 100%.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A total of 10 flaps were osteomyocutaneous and 19 were myocutaneous. The mean vertical size of the harvested skin paddle was 30.72 ± 4.57 cm (range: [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38], and the mean horizontal size of the skin paddle was 8.69 ± 0.80 (range: 7-10) cm, with the mean maximum horizontal extensions of the flaps being 16.03 ± 1.18 (range: 14-18) cm. The flap survival rates were 100%.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of these options is covering the wound with a large single flap. There are a few suitable donor sites for large flaps that include the thigh region for anterolateral thigh (ALT) flap and the lower abdominal area for rectus abdominis muscle myocutaneous flaps or deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flaps [20]. The literature presents some cases of very large flaps from these donor areas (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority of the perforators arise from the descending branch of the LCFA, with the remaining arising from the transverse branch, and less than 3% from the medial descending and ascending branch [ 7 ]. It has been used to reconstruct defects in different sites, such as lower abdomen, trochanteric region, thigh, groin and perineal region [ 8 , 9 ]. The ALT flap is associated with a high success rate of over 93–100% [ 1 , 2 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although in these cases microsurgical reconstruction may be considered, these two factors also often render the gluteal vessels (the only recipient vessels in proximity) unsuitable for free tissue transfer, thereby necessitating a significantly more complicated procedure involving vein grafts and position changes during surgery [ 2 , 3 ]. The anterolateral thigh (ALT) flap represents a pedicled option for reconstruction of gluteal defects; however, this is often limited to lateral defects since it is located further from the buttocks than the TFL flap [ 8 , 9 ]. In addition, in our experience, the TFL flap is more easily harvested from a lateral decubitus position compared to the ALT flap, to allow for simultaneous access to the gluteal defect.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%