Pediatric Vital Sign Distribution Derived From a Multi-Centered Emergency Department Database

Abstract

BackgroundWe hypothesized that current vital sign thresholds used in pediatric emergency department (ED) screening tools do not reflect observed vital signs in this population. We analyzed a large multi-centered database to develop heart rate (HR) and respiratory rate centile rankings and z-scores that could be incorporated into electronic health record ED screening tools and we compared our derived centiles to previously published centiles and Pediatric Advanced Life Support (PALS) vital sign thresholds.MethodsInitial HR and respiratory rate data entered into the Cerner™ electronic health record at 169 participating hospitals’ ED over 5 years (2009 through 2013) as part of routine care were analyzed. Analysis was restricted to non-admitted children (0 to <18 years). Centile curves and z-scores were developed using generalized additive models for location, scale, and shape. A split-sample validation using two-thirds of the sample was compared with the remaining one-third. Centile values were compared with results from previous studies and guidelines.ResultsHR and RR centiles and z-scores were determined from ~1.2 million records. Empirical 95th centiles for HR and respiratory rate were higher than previously published results and both deviated from PALS guideline recommendations.ConclusionHeart and respiratory rate centiles derived from a large real-world non-hospitalized ED pediatric population can inform the modification of electronic and paper-based screening tools to stratify children by the degree of deviation from normal for age rather than dichotomizing children into groups having “normal” versus “abnormal” vital signs. Furthermore, these centiles also may be useful in paper-based screening tools and bedside alarm limits for children in areas other than the ED and may establish improved alarm limits for bedside monitors.

A big-data approach to producing descriptive anthropometric references: a feasibility and validation study of paediatric growth charts

“…Our approach offers novel perspectives for generating growth charts and could be applied in other countries and other medical domains, provided that related data are stored in medical-records databases from which they can be easily extracted. 45 However, extreme care should be taken regarding the potential risks of bias when extracting such large datasets. In this context, it is paramount to find ways to check for correct calibration.…”

The association between prehospital vital signs of children and their critical clinical outcomes at hospitals

“…These include the evidence-based centile curves of heart rates (HRs) and respiratory rates (RRs) of the following: healthy children 1 , children in emergency departments 2 , 3 , hospitalized children 4 , and hospitalized critically ill children (HRs and blood pressure centile curves) 5 . These charts are widely referred to for patient assessments 6 , 7 and pediatric triage scales in emergency departments 3 , 8 – 11 . However, the reliability and validity of the pediatric triage scales are insufficient 12 – 14 .…”

SIRS o no SIRS: ¿es esa la infección? Una revisión crítica de los criterios de definición de sepsis

“…Incluso, para definir la hipotensión, otros investigadores encontraron que los valores normales para algunas poblaciones son mayores que los rangos sugeridos por algunas guías de resucitación, como por ejemplo la guía PALS (Pediatric Advanced Life Support) 22 . La distribución normal puede diferir según el sitio donde los parámetros vitales sean medidos, como se demuestra en distintos análisis multicéntricos de cientos de miles de niños sanos 23 atendidos en salas de hospitalización 24 o en el contexto de una UCI pediátrica 25 . También puede variar por grupos de enfermedades, como mostraron Eytan, et al, en 2017 26 .…”