2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.anl.2017.11.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pediatric type 1 cartilage tympanoplasty outcomes: A comparison of short and long term hearing results

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There has been no consensus so far about the ideal graft material for tympanoplasty. Kaya et al and Çayir et al have reported a high success rate (96-97%) with cartilage tympanoplasty; similar results have been noted by Ozbek, Yegin and Friedman et al 10,12,[25][26][27] On the other hand, Demirci, Şen et al and Özdamar et al have noted no difference in cartilage and fascia tympanoplasties: whereas Bozdemir et al found better results with fascia, compared with conchal cartilage. [28][29][30][31] Mohamad et al, in their systematic review, reported that tympanoplasties with cartilage to have a better morphological outcome than fascia; however, they did not find much difference in hearing outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There has been no consensus so far about the ideal graft material for tympanoplasty. Kaya et al and Çayir et al have reported a high success rate (96-97%) with cartilage tympanoplasty; similar results have been noted by Ozbek, Yegin and Friedman et al 10,12,[25][26][27] On the other hand, Demirci, Şen et al and Özdamar et al have noted no difference in cartilage and fascia tympanoplasties: whereas Bozdemir et al found better results with fascia, compared with conchal cartilage. [28][29][30][31] Mohamad et al, in their systematic review, reported that tympanoplasties with cartilage to have a better morphological outcome than fascia; however, they did not find much difference in hearing outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…3,4 Numerous publications have assessed factors influencing the outcome of pediatric tympanoplasty. 2,4,[8][9][10] There are conflicting reports from different parts of the world with varying population subgroups, on the role of age, the status of the contralateral ear, the role of adenoids and the type of graft material. [2][3][4][8][9][10][11] Our success rate of 91.7% was comparable to the successful outcome of adult tympanoplasty.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The success rate of tympanoplasty decreases with time. 20,21 The success rate of tympanoplasty with long-term follow-up is lower than that with short-term follow-up. 17,22 As the follow-up time increases, more patients have surgical failure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At 3 years, the rate of reperforation was very low (one case out of 66, 2%) but the rate of myringitis was surprisingly high (9%) and could be a consequence of the use of cartilage to close the TM. Although no statistical link has been established, it has been described previously in other cartilage tympanoplasty studies (14,15). No specific clinical characteristic was identified in children with myringitis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%