1989
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3476(89)80278-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pediatric patients, DRG hospital payment, and comorbidities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They reported that hospital cost, LOS, percentage of LOS outliers, and mortality increased as the number of CCs per patient increased, even for patients categorized into medical noncomplications and comorbidity-stratified DRG groups, resulting in financial risk for hospitals without any DRG adjustments based upon CCs. In another study by Munoz et al [13], major inequities in the DRG prospective hospital payment system were confirmed for pediatric patients, generating a financial burden for hospital management. For example, if hospital cost correlates positively with LOS, hematological diseases or systemic infections may cause more financial loss, while eye diseases may not.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They reported that hospital cost, LOS, percentage of LOS outliers, and mortality increased as the number of CCs per patient increased, even for patients categorized into medical noncomplications and comorbidity-stratified DRG groups, resulting in financial risk for hospitals without any DRG adjustments based upon CCs. In another study by Munoz et al [13], major inequities in the DRG prospective hospital payment system were confirmed for pediatric patients, generating a financial burden for hospital management. For example, if hospital cost correlates positively with LOS, hematological diseases or systemic infections may cause more financial loss, while eye diseases may not.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…However, problems have emerged in situations where some patients are under-reimbursed if they have more CCs and have consumed more hospital resources than those with fewer CCs. Munoz et al [13] reported major inequities in Diagnosis-Related Group (DRG) prospective payment systems for pediatric patients. Jencks et al [14] showed that the number of recorded diagnoses was no higher for patients who died than for those who survived.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In studies that focused mainly on adult patients, teaching hospitals delivered care at higher costs than other types of hospitals. 1 Although the reasons for higher costs varied among the many studies, the two major contributors were more adverse case-mix/severity of illness [2][3][4][5][6] and a larger proportion of poor patients at teaching hospitals compared with other hospitals. [7][8][9][10][11] Estimates of the importance of case-mix varied from 9% to 30% of costs, 12 but even after adjusting for case-mix, teaching hospitals still cost more.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of these, the majority (n = 28; 77.8%) were published in 1990 or before. [15][16][17][18][19][20][21]23,24,[27][28][29]31,34,35,[37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46]48,49 Most studies (n = 31; 86.1%) were set in the USA. [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42]…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%