“…While reports of treatment efficacy from clinical trials and qualitative reviews can guide clinical decision-making (Daniels, 2001;Dietz & Robinson, 2005;Edmunds, Waters, & Elliott, 2001;Epstein, Myers, Raynor, & Saelens, 1998;Goldfield, Raynor, & Epstein, 2002;Jelalian & Saelens, 1999;Kaur, Hyder, & Poston, 2003;Kirk, Scott, & Daniels, 2005;Whitlock, Williams, Gold, Smith, & Shipman, 2005;Yanovski, 2001), meta-analytic reviews allow for an objective assessment of the overall magnitude of treatment effects across a number of tests of treatment efficacy (Cooper, 1998). Currently, there are only three such meta-analyses to guide treatment recommendations: 1) Haddock, Shadish, Klesges, & Stein's (1994) metaanalytic review of behavioral treatments (treatments containing dietary, exercise, and/or behavioral modification components), 2) Epstein and Goldfield's (1999) meta-analysis of physical activity in the treatment of pediatric overweight, and 3) Collins, Warren, Neve, McCoy, and Stokes' (2006) meta-analysis of dietetic interventions in the treatment of pediatric overweight.…”