2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2019.05.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pediatric intraocular pressure measurements: Tonometers, central corneal thickness, and anesthesia

Abstract: Measuring intraocular pressure (IOP) is the cornerstone of a comprehensive glaucoma examination. In babies or small children, however, IOP measurements are problematic, cannot often be performed at the slit lamp, and sometimes require general anesthesia. Therefore, it is essential for an ophthalmologist who examines a pediatric patient to be aware of the different tonometers used in children, as well as the effects of central corneal thickness and anesthesia on IOP measurements. Goldmann applanation tonometry … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 187 publications
(184 reference statements)
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ideally, applanation tonometry should be used for IOP measurement 22 , but it was invasive and not routinely performed in our practice. We were not able to measure corneal thickness, which was associated with IOP 23 . Typically, IOP varies within 24 hours; thus, these patients should be investigated throughout this time cycle 24 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Ideally, applanation tonometry should be used for IOP measurement 22 , but it was invasive and not routinely performed in our practice. We were not able to measure corneal thickness, which was associated with IOP 23 . Typically, IOP varies within 24 hours; thus, these patients should be investigated throughout this time cycle 24 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Nevertheless, we argued that diabetes mellitus and hypertension were not associated with ocular hypertension. We used a noncontact tonometer, which is not the gold standard for IOP measurements 23. IOP measurement with applanation tonometry would have been better, in addition to considering the diurnal variation and central corneal thickness,24 but tonometry is invasive and not routinely performed in our practice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used a noncontact tonometer, which is not the gold standard for IOP measurements. 23 IOP measurement with applanation tonometry would have been better, in addition to considering the diurnal variation and central corneal thickness, 24 but tonometry is invasive and not routinely performed in our practice. In future studies, we will use tonometry and consider the influence of the corneal thickness.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous reports of childhood glaucoma have taken ≤21 mm Hg as success criteria. However, since the normal IOP in an infant is less than that of adults[ 17 ] we used a more stringent criteria of ≤18 mm Hg to define success rates. Outcomes were defined as complete success, qualified success, and failure, as follows: Complete success: when IOP was ≤18 mm Hg without drugs; Qualified success: when IOP was ≤18 mm Hg with up to two topical drugs; Failure: when IOP was >18 mm Hg on two topical drugs, there was a need for systemic drugs for IOP control or requirement of re-surgery.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%