2015
DOI: 10.1159/000381372
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pediatric Dysphagia: Physiology, Assessment, and Management

Abstract: Infancy and childhood represent a time of unparalleled physical growth and cognitive development. In order for infants and children to reach their linear and neurological growth potential, they must be able to reliably and safely consume sufficient energy and nutrients. Swallowing difficulties (dysphagia) in pediatric populations can have a detrimental effect on dietary intake and, thus, growth and development. As a result, it is imperative to accurately identify and appropriately manage dysphagia in pediatric… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
161
0
29

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 191 publications
(190 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
161
0
29
Order By: Relevance
“…Abnormalities in triggering of the swallow include absent swallow, delayed trigger of swallow, suck-swallow-breathing (SSB) incoordination, and pharyngeal phase symptoms include laryngeal penetration, aspiration, choking, pharyngeal residue and nasopharyngeal reflux. [14] Common criteria by healthcare professionals for referral of infants and children for feeding and swallowing evaluation included: suckling and swallowing incoordination, weak suck, breathing disruptions or apnoea during feeding, excessive gagging or recurrent coughing during feeds, diagnosis of disorders associated with dysphagia or under-nutrition, severe irritability during feeding, history of recurrent pneumonia and feeding difficulty, concern for possible aspiration during feeds, lethargy or decreased arousal during feeds, tedious feeding times and nasopharyngeal reflux during feeding.…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Abnormalities in triggering of the swallow include absent swallow, delayed trigger of swallow, suck-swallow-breathing (SSB) incoordination, and pharyngeal phase symptoms include laryngeal penetration, aspiration, choking, pharyngeal residue and nasopharyngeal reflux. [14] Common criteria by healthcare professionals for referral of infants and children for feeding and swallowing evaluation included: suckling and swallowing incoordination, weak suck, breathing disruptions or apnoea during feeding, excessive gagging or recurrent coughing during feeds, diagnosis of disorders associated with dysphagia or under-nutrition, severe irritability during feeding, history of recurrent pneumonia and feeding difficulty, concern for possible aspiration during feeds, lethargy or decreased arousal during feeds, tedious feeding times and nasopharyngeal reflux during feeding.…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9 The exclusion criteria were a history of oropharyngeal disease or surgery, having a diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux, or prior participation in a swallowing rehabilitation program. Ethical approval was obtained from the Hacettepe University Non-invasive Clinical Research Ethics Committee (Approval number: GO16/57-05).…”
Section: A Teri Als An D M Eth Od Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inclusion criteria for swallowing difficulty complaints or symptoms were problems in controlling food or saliva in the mouth, inability to swallow solid food, difficulty initiating a swallow, coughing and/or choking during swallowing, unexplained weight loss, a gurgly or wet voice after swallowing, and nasal regurgitation. 9 The exclusion criteria were a history of oropharyngeal disease or surgery, having a diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux, or prior participation in a swallowing rehabilitation program.…”
Section: A Teri Als An D M Eth Od Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pediatric swallow is distinct from an adult's in pathophysiology, etiology, and presentation . Due to the high incidence of silent aspiration in children, clinical examination is often considered unreliable in detecting patients at risk of aspiration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%