2006
DOI: 10.1213/01.ane.0000228302.15293.de
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pediatric Drug Development in Anesthesiology: An FDA Perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the FDA is authorized to regulate off‐label marketing, it does not regulate the practice of medicine nor did the off‐label use of FDA approve medications in clinical practice . Since 1997, several laws (i.e., Food and Drug Administration Modernization Act, Best Pharmaceutical for Children Act, and Pediatric Research Equity Act) have been enacted to increase the amount of information regarding the level of safety and efficacy of medications and to control off‐label prescribing in pediatric populations . Although such laws exist and the labeling of many drugs now includes more usable pediatric prescribing information as a result, we find that off‐label prescribing for antidepressants was quite prevalent even with these FDA pediatric acts in effect.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Although the FDA is authorized to regulate off‐label marketing, it does not regulate the practice of medicine nor did the off‐label use of FDA approve medications in clinical practice . Since 1997, several laws (i.e., Food and Drug Administration Modernization Act, Best Pharmaceutical for Children Act, and Pediatric Research Equity Act) have been enacted to increase the amount of information regarding the level of safety and efficacy of medications and to control off‐label prescribing in pediatric populations . Although such laws exist and the labeling of many drugs now includes more usable pediatric prescribing information as a result, we find that off‐label prescribing for antidepressants was quite prevalent even with these FDA pediatric acts in effect.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Nevertheless, because of differences in the clinical pharmacology of muscle relaxants between adult and pediatric patients, 18 it is necessary to conduct clinical trials in the pediatric population. 31,32 Neonates were not included in this study because there are insufficient data on the use of rocuronium in this age group. As in other age groups, the median time to recovery of the TOF ratio to 0.9 in the infant group decreased markedly with increasing doses of sugammadex.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Off-label use of drugs for sedation of children has grown exponentially prior to the development of well-controlled clinical trials in the pediatric population. A number of legislative changes are intended to improve drug labeling for safe and efficacious sedation in children [84,85].…”
Section: Special Consideration For Pediatric Drug Use and Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%