2015
DOI: 10.1186/s40621-015-0048-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pediatric bicycle-related head injuries: a population-based study in a county without a helmet law

Abstract: BackgroundHead injuries are the leading cause of death among cyclists, 85 % of which can be prevented by wearing a bicycle helmet. This study aims to estimate the incidence of pediatric bicycle-related injuries in Olmsted County and assess differences in injuries between those wearing helmets vs. not.MethodsOlmsted County, Minnesota residents 5 to 18 years of age with a diagnostic code consistent with an injury associated with the use of a bicycle between January 1, 2002, and December 31, 2011, were identified… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(38 reference statements)
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, helmet use is associated with a 51 % reduction in the odds of intra-cranial hemorrhage (OR = 0.49, 95 % CI 0.29-0.83) while cervical spine fracture is not statistically significant with an odds ratio near 1 (OR = 1.05, p = 0.9) when using the alternative controls. Note that the odds ratios have been inverted to be consistent with other published studies [3,5,8], i.e., OR < 1 indicates a protective effect of helmets.…”
supporting
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In particular, helmet use is associated with a 51 % reduction in the odds of intra-cranial hemorrhage (OR = 0.49, 95 % CI 0.29-0.83) while cervical spine fracture is not statistically significant with an odds ratio near 1 (OR = 1.05, p = 0.9) when using the alternative controls. Note that the odds ratios have been inverted to be consistent with other published studies [3,5,8], i.e., OR < 1 indicates a protective effect of helmets.…”
supporting
confidence: 64%
“…Since Joseph and colleagues have limited presentations to cyclists with an initial head CT, it is unlikely the substitution assumption is valid as it is known helmeted cyclists receive head imaging at a significantly lower rate than non-helmeted cyclists [3]. There is also evidence nonhelmeted cyclists have poorer outcomes in the data set analyzed by Joseph and colleagues as they were associated with higher rates of hospital (OR = 2.03, 95 % CI 1.49-2.78, p < 0.001) and ICU admissions (OR = 1.61, 95 % CI 1.03-2.53, p = 0.037).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In another population-based study of pediatric bicyclerelated head injuries, a small subgroup analysis noted those with severe outcomes, such as intensive care unit admission or death, were patients whose primary injury mechanism was being struck by a motor vehicle. Further, of the youth bicyclists presenting with a head injury, that group was less likely to have worn a helmet, and more likely to undergo CT scans and X-rays when compared to helmeted riders (Kaushik et al 2015). Motor vehicle involvement increased the risk of serious injury requiring hospitalizations among children treated in emergency departments (McAdams et al 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The most common mechanisms that cause head injuries in children are falls, road traffic crashes and sports activities, which are all preventable. Numerous safety measures have been introduced with the aim of reducing head injuries among children, including air bags, seat belt height adjusting booster seats and rear facing infant car seats, helmets, impact attenuating playground surfaces and trampoline safety enclosures . However, head injuries still remain a common cause of hospitalisation among children.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%