1999
DOI: 10.1533/cras.1999.0104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pedestrian impact and run over using a multibody simulation tool

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Its advantages include valid treatment of damping, which allows rate effects to be correctly included. It does not suffer from the problems associated with several previous methods of characterising contact-impact properties in pedestrian simulation studies, such as the inability to include rate dependent effects, and/or extrapolation/interpolation to different impact energies [4,5] or the inability to include permanent deformation [17,18]. It is a practicable and justifiable method of defining stiffness that is likely to be valid over a wider range of impact conditions than previous contact-impact models used in reported simulations of pedestrian impacts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Its advantages include valid treatment of damping, which allows rate effects to be correctly included. It does not suffer from the problems associated with several previous methods of characterising contact-impact properties in pedestrian simulation studies, such as the inability to include rate dependent effects, and/or extrapolation/interpolation to different impact energies [4,5] or the inability to include permanent deformation [17,18]. It is a practicable and justifiable method of defining stiffness that is likely to be valid over a wider range of impact conditions than previous contact-impact models used in reported simulations of pedestrian impacts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An alternative approach for the characterisation of pedestrian vehicle contacts was suggested by [17] and [18], based on earlier work by Lankarani and Nikravesh [19] (explained in detail below), but the approach does not account for energy loss due to permanent deformation, and appears not to have been taken up by others in the pedestrian crash simulation field.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accident reconstruction involving pedestrians can be complex and, in general, requires the use of 3D biomechanical models of the human body [3]. Multibody dynamics has been used in the development of these models successfully [3][4][5][6]. The development of vehicle and pedestrian models and its use in computational tools based in multibody [8] systems dynamics are essential.…”
Section: Accident Reconstruction Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%