2017 13th International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Security (CIS) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/cis.2017.00099
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pedestrian Detection Method Based on Faster R-CNN

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This means landmarks could be detected but may not be precise or have high accuracy. Comparing to well-configured examples presented in [19][20][21], the accuracy of our Faster R-CNN was moderately lower. This reduction in detection accuracy is the cause of a lower localization accuracy, as landmark detection results are required to generate localization results in the Faster R-CNN localization method.…”
Section: Detection Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This means landmarks could be detected but may not be precise or have high accuracy. Comparing to well-configured examples presented in [19][20][21], the accuracy of our Faster R-CNN was moderately lower. This reduction in detection accuracy is the cause of a lower localization accuracy, as landmark detection results are required to generate localization results in the Faster R-CNN localization method.…”
Section: Detection Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…The increased speed of Faster R-CNN for object detection makes it suitable for real time applications [17,18]. Implementations of Faster R-CNN spread throughout various applications, such as the detection of cyclists in depth images [19], pedestrian detection from security cameras [20], and ship detection in remote sensing images that contain foggy scenes [21]. In [19][20][21] it is shown that Faster R-CNN has high accuracy (more than 80%), slightly higher than human volunteers that have approximately 75% accuracy [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results demonstrated 23% miss rate of deep features as compared with 46% miss rate for hand-crafted HOG features. Recently, deep learning-based faster RCNN model has been employed by Zhang et al [2], and it was evaluated with a total of ten thousand training images and one thousand testing images. Experimental analysis indicated a 92.70% precision, and 87.60% recall were achieved.…”
Section: Deep Learning Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One promising solution to address such a challenge is by employing deep learning models. Recently, various deep learning-based approaches have been implemented such as Faster R-CNN [2], YOLO [3], and tiny-YOLO [4]. Motivated by the cheap cost of the drone and the success of these deep learning models in handling image-based object detection problems [2], this work is aiming to adopt Faster R-CNN to handle the problem of pedestrian detection from drone-based images.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The detection and tracking of pedestrians using these methods have been extensively studied (24). These research initiatives have used convolutional neural networks to track people for a variety of purposes which closely mirror the needs of trespassing, for example autonomous driving (25)(26)(27), traffic safety (28,29), and surveillance (30)(31)(32)(33)(34)(35). The variance in the literature consists in the adjustment of variables of a convolutional neural network (number of layers, orientation of layers, application of study, etc.)…”
Section: Ai For Trespass Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%