2020
DOI: 10.1063/5.0024055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pedestal electron collisionality and toroidal rotation during ELM-crash suppression phase under n = 1 RMP in KSTAR

Abstract: The combined kinetic effects of the ion temperature gradient and the velocity shear of a plasma flow parallel to the magnetic field on the drift-Alfven instabilities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[11,25]), a nonlinear code calculations, such as EMC3-EIRENE [26,27], appear essential to benchmark the measured broadening of divertor heat flux. Meanwhile, according to the latest database of edge parameters [28], the RMP-driven, ELM-crash-control in KSTAR shows a rather scattered dependence of edge electron density (n e ) and collisionalities (ν e * ), while the E × B rotation threshold necessary for RMP-driven, ELM-crash-suppression needs to be further elaborated. This implies that high-density, highcollisionality plasmas might not necessarily prevent RMPs from suppressing the ELMs, but could be readily compatible with partially detached plasmas.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[11,25]), a nonlinear code calculations, such as EMC3-EIRENE [26,27], appear essential to benchmark the measured broadening of divertor heat flux. Meanwhile, according to the latest database of edge parameters [28], the RMP-driven, ELM-crash-control in KSTAR shows a rather scattered dependence of edge electron density (n e ) and collisionalities (ν e * ), while the E × B rotation threshold necessary for RMP-driven, ELM-crash-suppression needs to be further elaborated. This implies that high-density, highcollisionality plasmas might not necessarily prevent RMPs from suppressing the ELMs, but could be readily compatible with partially detached plasmas.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The discharge takes the shape of a diverted lower single null with moderate elongation κ ≈ 1.7 and a high triangularity δ = (δ u + δ l )/2 ≈ 0.58: the target position of the bottom X point (R x = 1.38 m, Z x = −0.88 m) is known to be suitable for the ELM crash suppression and is fully established after t = 3.5 s. To minimize and exclude transient shaping effects, we set the auxiliary heating to occur after t = 3.5 s so that the first L-H transition occurs near the fully established shaping. To compare with the conventional feed-forward cases reported by KSTAR [17,29], the RMP configuration was set to n = 1 with 90 • phasing. In addition, q 95 is set around 4.8 right after the H-mode transition time at t = 3.14 s. When the first ELM crash occurs, q 95 ≈ 4.9. q 95 for the reference discharge at the H-mode transition moment is near the lower bound for the n = 1 ELM crash suppression [29,30].…”
Section: Setup For the Reference H-mode Dischargementioning
confidence: 99%
“…To compare with the conventional feed-forward cases reported by KSTAR [17,29], the RMP configuration was set to n = 1 with 90 • phasing. In addition, q 95 is set around 4.8 right after the H-mode transition time at t = 3.14 s. When the first ELM crash occurs, q 95 ≈ 4.9. q 95 for the reference discharge at the H-mode transition moment is near the lower bound for the n = 1 ELM crash suppression [29,30].…”
Section: Setup For the Reference H-mode Dischargementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ideally, full suppression of ELMs is desirable, but access and sustainment of ELM-suppressed scenarios in reactor-scale devices with detached divertor conditions is uncertain, particularly in a device with limited torque injection available relative to the plasma inertia. Suppression of ELMs using applied 3D resonant magnetic perturbations (RMPs) has been demonstrated in many tokamak devices [7][8][9][10]. In DIII-D, RMP ELM suppression appears to require a rotation profile where the E × B rotation crosses zero near the top of the pedestal, which has thus far not been accessible with zero net injected torque [11,12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%