2015
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.114.105002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pedestal Bifurcation and Resonant Field Penetration at the Threshold of Edge-Localized Mode Suppression in the DIII-D Tokamak

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

22
189
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 152 publications
(219 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
22
189
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This may also explain a similar discrepancy between the measured response and MARS-F modeling found in DIII-D recently [24]. Different from the observation of field penetration on ELM suppression in DIII-D [17], the penetrated toroidal mode number here is the same as the applied one.…”
contrasting
confidence: 50%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This may also explain a similar discrepancy between the measured response and MARS-F modeling found in DIII-D recently [24]. Different from the observation of field penetration on ELM suppression in DIII-D [17], the penetrated toroidal mode number here is the same as the applied one.…”
contrasting
confidence: 50%
“…This is the first observation of full ELM suppression using RMPs in the medium plasma collisionality regime in EAST, and it expands beyond the previous observations of ELM suppression on DIII-D [1,3] and KSTAR [7]. It is found that not only the formation of a magnetic island near the edge [17] but also a critical level of magnetic topological change, taking into account plasma response, play a key role in accessing final ELM suppression. This observation also reveals different roles of linear and nonlinear response effects on ELM suppression.…”
supporting
confidence: 49%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…At the same time, the absence of H α spikes at those burst events indicates that the bursts are localized in the plasma edge region, which is distinguished from the usual ELM crashes involving the collapse of the pedestal with large particle transport. The pattern velocity of the ELMs in the crash-suppression phase is typically small on the order of ∼1 km=s and sometimes they appear to halt, similar to the reduction of perpendicular electron flow in the ELM-crash-suppression phase observed in DIII-D [15]. On the other hand, the pattern velocity of ordinary ELMs in the KSTAR device is observed in a wide range (up to several 10s km=s) in both electron and ion diamagnetic directions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Significant E r profile change at the plasma edge usually accompanies the application of RMPs [20][21][22][23][24][25][26]. Our results suggest that the E × B flow shear may influence ELMs through its influence on the kink/peeling instabilities.…”
Section: E × B Flow Shear Drive Of the Linear Low-n Modes Of Eho In Tmentioning
confidence: 72%