2018
DOI: 10.1007/s11214-018-0500-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Peculiar Supernovae

Abstract: What makes a supernova truly "peculiar?" In this chapter we attempt to address this question by tracing the history of the use of "peculiar" as a descriptor of non-standard supernovae back to the original binary spectroscopic classification of Type I vs. Type II proposed by Minkowski (1941). A handful of noteworthy examples (including SN 2012au, SN 2014C, iPTF14hls, and iPTF15eqv) are highlighted to illustrate a general theme: classes of supernovae that were once thought to be peculiar are later seen as logica… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 147 publications
(174 reference statements)
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With the emergence of box-shaped line profiles and a narrow Hα component, Andrews & Smith (2018) regarded the scenario with a previously hidden CSM scenario plausible. This conclusion was echoed by Milisavljevic & Margutti (2018), who presented a late-time (1210 d) spectrum of iPTF14hls and compared it with the Type IIn SN 2009ip, stating that the narrow lines are associated with nearby photoionised material.…”
Section: Spectral Evolution and Narrow Linesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…With the emergence of box-shaped line profiles and a narrow Hα component, Andrews & Smith (2018) regarded the scenario with a previously hidden CSM scenario plausible. This conclusion was echoed by Milisavljevic & Margutti (2018), who presented a late-time (1210 d) spectrum of iPTF14hls and compared it with the Type IIn SN 2009ip, stating that the narrow lines are associated with nearby photoionised material.…”
Section: Spectral Evolution and Narrow Linesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Such events might not be extremely rare as Arcavi et al (2018) Several theoretical studies propose different scenarios to account for the properties of iPTF14hls, and in particular for its prolonged light curve, but none can fit all properties of iPTF14hls (e.g., Sollerman et al 2019;Woosley 2018). These scenarios include a pair instability supernova (e.g., Woosley 2018;Vigna-Gómez et al 2019), a magnetar, i.e., a rapidly rotating magnetic NS (e.g., Arcavi et al 2017;Dessart 2018;Woosley 2018), fallback accretion (e.g., Arcavi et al 2017;Wang et al 2018;Liu et al 2019), an interaction of the ejecta with a circumstellar matter (CSM; Andrews & Smith 2017;Milisavljevic & Margutti 2018), and a common envelope jets supernova scenario (CEJSN; e.g., Soker & Gilkis 2018).…”
Section: The Peaks Of the Jets' Mini-explosionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The velocities of the Fe II and H α lines remain at approximately 4,000 and 8,000 km s −1 , respectively. A hydrogen-rich and massive star has been suggested as the progenitor of iPTF14hls [2,34].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%