“…The main reason has been the greater rate of complications associated with the PMMF compared with that of the MFTF, 16,17 resulting in longer hospital stays 3 and greater financial burden. [5][6][7]18 However, it is still useful as a salvage flap in the case of free-flap failures 4,5,8,17 and might be the best option when using the MFTF is not possible (eg, medical comorbidities, hypercoagulable states, lack of recipient vessels, and limited resources or microsurgical specialists in developing countries). 4,7,10,19 Moreover, the large bulk of intervening muscle is useful for covering the great vessels in the neck in the case of radical neck dissection 7,9,14 and for preventing pharyngocutaneous fistula in case of laryngopharyngectomies.…”