2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.fusengdes.2005.06.305
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pebble bed thermal–mechanical theoretical model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The pebble arrangement in the initial part of the first loading cycle and in the final part of the unloading cycle is not described by the model. The aspect of the experimental contact zone (a cylindrical part plastically deformed) corresponds perfectly to the evolution of the plasticity assumed in the model (see [1][2][3]). …”
Section: Comparison Between the Theoretical And Experimental Resultsmentioning
confidence: 60%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The pebble arrangement in the initial part of the first loading cycle and in the final part of the unloading cycle is not described by the model. The aspect of the experimental contact zone (a cylindrical part plastically deformed) corresponds perfectly to the evolution of the plasticity assumed in the model (see [1][2][3]). …”
Section: Comparison Between the Theoretical And Experimental Resultsmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…The theoretical model developed by the authors describes the thermo-mechanical behaviour of two compressed spheres and extends the results to a pebble bed assuming that it is made up of a mixture of regular lattices [1][2][3]. The mechanical stiffness is determined by considering two half spheres as variable cross-section beams and assuming the behaviour of the material to be elastic-perfectly plastic under compressive stresses and elastic under tensile stresses.…”
Section: Comparison Between the Theoretical And Experimental Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation