2002
DOI: 10.4095/213529
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Peatlands of Canada database

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These studies also highlighted the existing uncertainties in current estimates and the need for more detailed assessments of such carbon pools and the character of OM, and a denser coverage with field data on shallow and deep carbon. For the peatland component of the permafrost soil carbon pool relative good estimates of carbon distribution with depth exist based on peatland inventories and thousands of peat cores from the circum Arctic [ Gorham , 1991; Smith et al , 2004; Tarnocai et al , 2000; Jones and Yu , 2010]. For mineral soils in permafrost regions, however, such spatial and depth information is still very rare, though it has been shown that including deeper permafrost and soil strata into carbon inventories considerably increases the permafrost carbon pool [ Bockheim and Hinkel , 2007; Ping et al , 2008].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These studies also highlighted the existing uncertainties in current estimates and the need for more detailed assessments of such carbon pools and the character of OM, and a denser coverage with field data on shallow and deep carbon. For the peatland component of the permafrost soil carbon pool relative good estimates of carbon distribution with depth exist based on peatland inventories and thousands of peat cores from the circum Arctic [ Gorham , 1991; Smith et al , 2004; Tarnocai et al , 2000; Jones and Yu , 2010]. For mineral soils in permafrost regions, however, such spatial and depth information is still very rare, though it has been shown that including deeper permafrost and soil strata into carbon inventories considerably increases the permafrost carbon pool [ Bockheim and Hinkel , 2007; Ping et al , 2008].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We summarized land cover data to the following classes: deciduous upland, evergreen upland, grassland, grassland shrubby upland, mixed upland, recent burns, snow and ice, tundra, water bodies, and wetland/peatlands, and used the deciduous upland, evergreen upland, and mixed upland classes to represent upland forests. Because the Canadian Land Classification Cover Map does not distinguish peatlands from other open ecosystems and appears to underestimate wetland cover, we performed similar overlays with fire perimeter maps and peatland distributions from the Peatlands of Canada database [ Tarnocai et al , 2000]. Polygons within the Peatlands of Canada database are not spatially explicit, but provide information on the average percentage of bog, fen, and permafrost peatland across Canada within 1° × 1° polygons.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The categories "50-100 % wetland" and "25-50 % wetland", for example, occur only in North America and "wetland complex" occurs only in Southeast Asia. One consequence is that the global extent of "bogs, fens, and mires" in the GLWD, 0.8 Mm 2 , is smaller than the Canadian area of peatlands, 1.1 Mm 2 (Tarnocai et al, 2002), which is dominated by bogs and fens. The spatial overlap of the GLWD and the GLCC categories is rather small (Table 6).…”
Section: Carbon In Global Wetlandsmentioning
confidence: 98%