2020
DOI: 10.1007/s11661-020-05679-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pearlite in Multicomponent Steels: Phenomenological Steady-State Modeling

Abstract: A steady-state model for austenite-to-pearlite transformation in multicomponent steel is presented, including Fe, C, and eight more elements. The model considers not only classic ingredients (formation of ferrite-cementite interface, volume diffusion, boundary diffusion, and optimization of lamellar spacing) but also finite austenite-pearlite interfacial mobility that resolves some previous difficulties. A non-Arrhenius behavior of interfacial mobility is revealed from growth rate and lamellar spacing data. A … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…22) Similarly, the phenomenon also applied under δ -pearlite growth, as the slope of experiment v and S shows n < − 2 and gradually deviate at long-time carburization specimens. Of course, although the solute drag effect as well as the interfacial mobility depleting the driving force should be also considered, 23) composition change is the principal reason why the calculated v B is larger than the experimental v. From these results, it is possible to control the unidirectional lamellar structure of δ -pearlite.…”
Section: Growth Kinetics Of δ -Pearlitementioning
confidence: 97%
“…22) Similarly, the phenomenon also applied under δ -pearlite growth, as the slope of experiment v and S shows n < − 2 and gradually deviate at long-time carburization specimens. Of course, although the solute drag effect as well as the interfacial mobility depleting the driving force should be also considered, 23) composition change is the principal reason why the calculated v B is larger than the experimental v. From these results, it is possible to control the unidirectional lamellar structure of δ -pearlite.…”
Section: Growth Kinetics Of δ -Pearlitementioning
confidence: 97%
“…where x is the mole fraction of carbon in the alloy, R is the universal gas constant in J mol −1 K −1 , and T is the temperature in K. Equation (19) can then be rearranged to give an expression for the time required to precipitate cementite, t θ . Takahashi and Bhadeshia concluded that 0.01 was a reasonable value for ξ(t), as this gave a "detectable" volume fraction of cementite.…”
Section: Predicting Cementite Formation Kineticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This then questions whether predictions can be accurately extrapolated past these systems to alloys with more than three components. Some of the more recent of these models [19,21] predicted the behaviour of quaternary alloys reasonably well; however, the accuracy of these predictions showed a notable decrease. Thermo-Calc predictions are also very slow, when compared to the rapidness of empirical and semi-empirical models, making the software undesirable when a large number of CCT predictions are required.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our previous research showed that increasing the heating rate of Fe-C-Cr bearing steel with an initial microstructure of lamellar pearlite also abnormally improved the austenitization rate [ 17 ]. For the lamellar pearlite, the lamellar spacing and the interfacial diffusion of the solutes should influence the pearlite to austenite transformation rate [ 18 ]. As the lamellae of pearlite have certain orientations, the relationship between the austenite growth direction and lamellar orientation also influences the transformation rate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%