Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2012
DOI: 10.1134/s1062359012080031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pearl mussels (Bivalvia, Margaritiferidae, Dahurinaia) from the Amur River basin

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2a, 2b)." The comparison per formed by Bogatov (2012) and his conclusion about the similarity of dentition in the holotypes of D. ussuriensis and D. transbaicalica are not correct. This work shows that the tooth in the right valve of these holotypes is very different (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…2a, 2b)." The comparison per formed by Bogatov (2012) and his conclusion about the similarity of dentition in the holotypes of D. ussuriensis and D. transbaicalica are not correct. This work shows that the tooth in the right valve of these holotypes is very different (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Reidentification of D. transbaicalica by the modi fied comparative method and its reduction to the syn onym of D. ussuriensis based on similarities in the con tour of the most protuberant valve section (Bogatov, 2012) showed that it is not species specific and that this method is not appropriate for identification of the pearl mussels species. The correctness of this method is proved by Bogatov (2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations