2007
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8276.2007.00991.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Peanut Research and Poverty Reduction: Impacts of Variety Improvement to Control Peanut Viruses in Uganda

Abstract: A procedure is developed and applied for predicting ex ante impacts of agricultural research on aggregate poverty, using as an example the poverty-reducing impact of peanut research in Uganda. Market-level information on economic surplus changes is combined with a procedure for allocating income changes to individual households. Characteristics of farmers that affect their likelihood of technology adoption are used to create a technology adoption profile. Associated changes in poverty resulting from adoption a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
51
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
51
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is however contrary to the findings of Moyo et al (2007), Mamudu et al (2012), Mugonola (2013) in which the sex of the farmer was found to significantly and positively influence adoption of IPM technologies. These authors report that male headed households are more likely to adopt improved technologies, especially those that are labor intensive.…”
Section: Results Of the Probit Modelscontrasting
confidence: 74%
“…This is however contrary to the findings of Moyo et al (2007), Mamudu et al (2012), Mugonola (2013) in which the sex of the farmer was found to significantly and positively influence adoption of IPM technologies. These authors report that male headed households are more likely to adopt improved technologies, especially those that are labor intensive.…”
Section: Results Of the Probit Modelscontrasting
confidence: 74%
“…A study on peanut research and poverty reduction to show the impacts of variety improvement to control peanut viruses in Uganda showed that sizable research benefits are generated by adopting Rosette-resistant varieties and the benefits accrue in open economy to adopting farmers [37].…”
Section: Diffusion Of Input Use Research In Africamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of their study using the poverty indices showed modest reduction in poverty, reflecting the fact that these surplus changes are distributed among a large number of peanut producing households; many of whom are not poor [37]. Technology adoption can lower per-unit cost of production, increase the supply of food, and raise incomes of adopting farmer.…”
Section: Linkage Between Using Agricultural Technology and Agriculturmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The survey conducted by ATU revealed that groundnuts, despite their high profitability compared to other crops, were not being grown by poor farmers because of the risk associated with production [13]. The use of HYV seeds can be a cost-effective and sustainable means to mitigate this risk, but a major hurdle to adoption is the relatively high cost of purchased seed [4,67]. Lessons from previous ATU projects indicated that farmer-led seed multiplication is an effective means of promoting access to and utilization of HYVs and alternative farming practices.…”
Section: The Atu Farmer-led Multiplication and Dissemination Programmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To address this low productivity, Ugandan plant breeders have become well-known for the development of high-yielding varieties (HYVs) of groundnut that exhibit disease and drought resistance [2]. Furthermore, recent studies of smallholders in Uganda have demonstrated the benefits of adopting groundnut HYVs [3][4][5][6], and how farmer networks can help to facilitate adoption [7,8]. This pattern of results begs the question: have efforts to promote HYVs led to increased adoption?…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%