2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2018.01.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Peak knee biomechanics and limb symmetry following unilateral anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Associations of walking gait and jump-landing outcomes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
19
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, similar hip and knee kinematics of failed- and passed-RTS groups in our study is contrary to the finding of Di Stasi et al (2013) who found different hip and knee kinematics in the passed- and failed-RTS groups during treadmill walking [5]. This controversy may be due to the differences in the task evaluated, as it has been shown that the kinematics of gait and landing tasks are not associated [38].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 98%
“…However, similar hip and knee kinematics of failed- and passed-RTS groups in our study is contrary to the finding of Di Stasi et al (2013) who found different hip and knee kinematics in the passed- and failed-RTS groups during treadmill walking [5]. This controversy may be due to the differences in the task evaluated, as it has been shown that the kinematics of gait and landing tasks are not associated [38].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 98%
“…Additionally, our kinetics and kinematics are similar to previous studies reporting these outcomes in individuals with ACLR. 6,22-25 Previous work has demonstrated that additional sagittal plane kinematics during walking gait, beyond the outcomes we assessed in our study, are associated with knee pain and kinesiophobia in individuals with lateral tibiofemoral compartment post-traumatic knee osteoarthritis following ACLR. 13 Specifically, individuals with higher kinesiophobia demonstrate greater peak trunk flexion during the stance phase of walking compared to those with lower kinesiophobia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…The vertical ground reaction force was analyzed for 5 s after ground contact and was defined as a vertical component of >5 N. The locus length of the center of pressure (COP) normalized by foot length (% foot length) was calculated to quantify the magnitude of postural sway and the maximum vertical ground reaction force normalized by body weight (VGRFmax) (% body weight, BW); time to peak (ms) and loading rate (% BW/ms) were similarly estimated to quantify force attenuation during landing. The loading rate was defined as the peak of the first derivative of the force–time curve [ 19 ]. The average of the values obtained in three successful trials was used for the additional analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%