1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9673(98)00042-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Peak distortion in reversed-phase liquid chromatography as a consequence of viscosity differences between sample solvent and mobile phase

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
38
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
4
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This fingering is detrimental to the separation technique as it contributes to peak broadening and distortions. Such conclusions have been reported by several authors either experimentally [7][8][9][10][11][12] or numerically. [12][13][14] Viscous fingering is also of much concern in the dispersion of finite polluted viscous zones inside aquifers.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…This fingering is detrimental to the separation technique as it contributes to peak broadening and distortions. Such conclusions have been reported by several authors either experimentally [7][8][9][10][11][12] or numerically. [12][13][14] Viscous fingering is also of much concern in the dispersion of finite polluted viscous zones inside aquifers.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…The relative strength of the injection solvent, together with viscosity differences compared with the mobile phase, are likely to be the causes of the efficiency loss [17][18][19]. Losses in efficiency due to solute overloading were unlikely to influence the results.…”
Section: Effect Of Increasing Injection Volume On Efficiency In Hilicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the potentially harmful character of the viscous fingering effect in chromatography was recognized in the early literature on size exclusion chromatography in which highly viscous polymeric samples are injected (see Introduction of Ref. [15] for a historical review of this recognition), it is more recently, in the two last decades, that this effect was considered for analytical chromatographic separations of relatively small molecular components [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%